Supporting primary care practices in building capacity to use health information data
- PMID: 25848621
- PMCID: PMC4371481
- DOI: 10.13063/2327-9214.1094
Supporting primary care practices in building capacity to use health information data
Abstract
Introduction: Our objective was to describe essential support resources and strategies in order to advance the pace and scope of the use of health information technology (HIT) data.
Background and context: Primary data were collected between January 2011 and October 2012. The primary study population comprised 51 primary care practices enrolled in the Colorado Beacon Consortium in western Colorado.
Methods: We used qualitative methods embedded in a mixed-method evaluation: monthly narrative reports from practices; interviews with providers and staff; and focused, group discussions with quality improvement (QI) advisors and staff from the Health Information Technology Regional Extension Center.
Findings: Practices valued effective support strategies to assist with using HIT, including the following: translating rules and regulations into individual practice settings; facilitating peer-to-peer connections; providing processes and tools for practice improvement; maintaining accountability and momentum; and providing local electronic health record (EHR) technical expertise. Benefits of support included improved quality measures, operational improvements, increased provider and staff engagement, and deeper understanding of EHR data.
Discussion: The findings affirm the utility of practice facilitation for HIT-focused aims with personalized attention and cross-fertilization among practices for improvements. Facilitation to sustain ongoing improvements and prepare for future HIT-intensive improvement activities was highly valued. In addition to the general practice facilitator, an EHR technical expert was critical to improving practice capacity to use electronic clinical data. Collaborative learning expands the pool of mentors and teachers, who can further translate their own lessons into practical advice for their peers, yielding the emergence of a stronger sense of community among the practices.
Conclusions: Using HIT more effectively in primary care will require sustained, focused efforts by practices as regulations, incentives and HIT evolve. Ongoing support for community-based practice facilitators; collaborative learning; and local, personalized EHR advisors will help practices care for patients while more effectively deploying HIT to improve care.
Similar articles
-
Practice Facilitator Strategies for Addressing Electronic Health Record Data Challenges for Quality Improvement: EvidenceNOW.J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):398-409. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170274. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018. PMID: 29743223 Free PMC article.
-
The journey of primary care practices to meaningful use: a Colorado Beacon Consortium study.J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):603-11. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.120344. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013. PMID: 24004712
-
Clinician Perspectives on the Benefits of Practice Facilitation for Small Primary Care Practices.Ann Fam Med. 2019 Aug 12;17(Suppl 1):S17-S23. doi: 10.1370/afm.2427. Ann Fam Med. 2019. PMID: 31405872 Free PMC article.
-
Costs and benefits of health information technology.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr;(132):1-71. doi: 10.23970/ahrqepcerta132. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006. PMID: 17627328 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The national improvement partnership network: state-based partnerships that improve primary care quality.Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec;13(6 Suppl):S84-94. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.04.001. Acad Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 24268091 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Reliability of EHR-Generated Clinical Outcomes Reports: A Case Study.EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 23;2(3):1102. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1102. eCollection 2014. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014. PMID: 25848626 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation and adoption of improvement coaching: A qualitative evidence synthesis.J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jan;32(1-2):3-30. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16247. Epub 2022 Apr 10. J Clin Nurs. 2023. PMID: 35403322 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of an evaluation framework for health information communication technology in contemporary pharmacy practice.Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Mar 29;9:100252. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100252. eCollection 2023 Mar. Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023. PMID: 37095892 Free PMC article.
-
Practice Facilitator Strategies for Addressing Electronic Health Record Data Challenges for Quality Improvement: EvidenceNOW.J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):398-409. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170274. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018. PMID: 29743223 Free PMC article.
-
IT-enabled Community Health Interventions: Challenges, Opportunities, and Future Directions.EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014 Oct 30;2(3):1117. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1117. eCollection 2014. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2014. PMID: 25848627 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baron RJ. Meaningful use of health information technology is managing information. JAMA. 2010;304(1):89–90. - PubMed
-
- DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Vogeli C, Zheng J, Rao SR, Shields AE, et al. Electronic Health Records’ Limited Successes Suggest More Targeted Uses. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(4):639–46. - PubMed
-
- Fernandopulle R, Patel N. How the electronic health record did not measure up to the demands of our medical home practice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(4):622–8. - PubMed
-
- Hsiao C-j, Decker SL, Hing E, Sisk JE. Most physicians were eligible for federal incentives in 2011, but few had EHR systems that met meaningful-use criteria. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31(5):1100–7. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources