Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 22;2(4):1128.
doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1128. eCollection 2014.

Linking costs to health outcomes for allocating scarce public health resources

Affiliations

Linking costs to health outcomes for allocating scarce public health resources

Phaedra S Corso et al. EGEMS (Wash DC). .

Abstract

Introduction: Resources for public health (PH) are scarce and policymakers face tough decisions in determining their funding priorities. The difficulty of making these decisions is compounded by current PH accounting systems, which are ill-equipped to link fiscal resources to PH outcomes. This paper examines the types of revenues and expenditures, health services, and health outcomes that are being tracked at the local and state PH levels. The authors provide recommendations for strengthening the ability of local and state governments to link expenditures to PH outcomes, both within and across jurisdictions.

Framework and next steps: The source of revenue data for most local jurisdictions is the accounting systems used for the budgeting and auditing of fiscal activities, and these are primarily linked to specific PH programs. In contrast, expenditure data are mostly generic and typically span multiple PH programs with no link to specific PH activities. Many challenges exist to then link PH activities to health outcomes data, which are often collected through separate reporting systems at the local, state, and national levels. Policy change at the state level and implementation strategies that are standardized across local health departments are required to assess the costs and health outcomes of PH activities.

Conclusion: Information linking PH expenditures to health outcomes of PH services could greatly inform the decision-making process. This information will allow investments in PH to be better understood and will provide a strong foundation for the PH services and systems research community to understand variation and drive improvement. Ultimately, these data could be used to improve accountability at the local and state PH department levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Logic Model for Linking Costs to Health Outcomes* Note: *Adapted from the 2011 Institute of Medicine report: For the Public’s Health: Investing in a Healthier Future.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. For the public’s health: investing in a healthier future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. - PubMed
    1. Barry M, Bialek R. Tracking our investments in public health: what have we learned? J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004;10(5):383–392. - PubMed
    1. Leviss PS, Novick LF. Examining public health financing in New York state: a methodology for evaluating local and national public health data. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004;10(5):393–399. - PubMed
    1. Bernet PM. Assessing the level of public health partner spending using the funding formula analysis tool. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2012;18(4):339–345. - PubMed
    1. Hadley CL, Feldman L, Toomey KE. Local public health cost study in Georgia. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2004;10(5):400–405. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources