Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar 1;4(1):4-8.
doi: 10.12861/jrip.2015.02. eCollection 2015.

Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article

Ali Ahmadi  1 , Hamid Soori  2
Affiliations
Review

Important statistical points to improve and promote the methodology of the articles on medical sciences, particularly nephrology and kidney; a review article

Ali Ahmadi et al. J Renal Inj Prev. .

Abstract

Background: Quality of articles' methodology is one of the important factors which is considered by researchers.

Objectives: This study was conducted to determine statistical guidelines on promotion of methodology's quality in the articles concerning medical sciences, particularly nephrology, to assist authors and reviewers.

Materials and methods: This study is a systematic review. Initially, the keywords "Epidemiologic Methods/analysis" [Mesh] OR "Epidemiologic Methods/epidemiology" and "reporting" were selected in Medline database. Then, reliable databases were searched for relevant publications. Being relevant, containing viewpoints, and recommending statistical guidelines as well as approval of at least two of the three examiners of articles were determined as the inclusion criteria into the study.

Results: Two hundred relevant articles were retrieved. Thirty-two articles met the inclusion criteria. By the examined articles, 30 applied points have determinative role for improving and promoting quality of articles methodology. Of the important points, introducing and describing target community and statistical population, mentioning article title, introducing independent and dependent variables as well as confounders, reporting sample size for subgroups and the whole study, summarizing the data according to their statistical distribution (reporting mean and standard deviation for data with normal distribution), reporting the type of rate (incidence, survival), ratio (odds, hazard) or risk (absolute, relative, difference) with 95% CI and the used software could be mentioned.

Conclusion: The most important factors contributing greatly to the quality of articles' methodology on nephrology were reported in the present study. Applying these factors by articles authors and reviewers could lead to improve articles' and journals' quality. In addition, use of the findings of the present study in articles' materials and methods could avoid research errors.

Keywords: Epidemiologic approaches; Epidemiologic research; Methodology; Statistical analysis; Statistical reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nasir A, HoLakhoo K. Evaluation of clinical research reporting in African Journal of Paediatric Surgery. AJPS. 2013;10(1):3–6. - PubMed
    1. Bailar JC, Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals Amplifications and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 1998;108(2):266–73. - PubMed
    1. Walter SD. Methods of reporting statistical resultsfrom medical research studies. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141(10):896–906. - PubMed
    1. Yergens DW, Dutton DJ, Patten SB. An overview of the statistical methods reported by studies using the Canadian community health survey. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:15. - PMC - PubMed
    1. He J, Jin Z, Yu D. Statistical reporting in Chinese biomedical journals. Lancet. 2009;373(9681):2091–3. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources