How tree species fill geographic and ecological space in eastern North America
- PMID: 25851139
- PMCID: PMC4407066
- DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv029
How tree species fill geographic and ecological space in eastern North America
Abstract
Background and aims: Ecologists broadly accept that the number of species present within a region balances regional processes of immigration and speciation against competitive and other interactions between populations that limit distribution and constrain diversity. Although ecological theory has, for a long time, addressed the premise that ecological space can be filled to 'capacity' with species, only with the availability of time-calibrated phylogenies has it been possible to test the hypothesis that diversification slows as the number of species in a region increases. Focusing on the deciduous trees of eastern North America, this study tested predictions from competition theory concerning the distribution and abundance of species.
Methods: Local assemblages of trees tabulated in a previous study published in 1950 were analysed. Assemblages were ordinated with respect to species composition by non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMS). Distributions of trees were analysed by taxonomically nested analysis of variance, discriminant analysis based on NMS scores, and canonical correlation analysis of NMS scores and Bioclim climate variables.
Key results: Most of the variance in species abundance and distribution was concentrated among closely related (i.e. congeneric) species, indicating evolutionary lability. Species distribution and abundance were unrelated to the number of close relatives, suggesting that competitive effects are diffuse. Distances between pairs of congeneric species in NMS space did not differ significantly from distances between more distantly related species, in contrast to the predictions of both competitive habitat partitioning and ecological sorting of species.
Conclusions: Eastern deciduous forests of North America do not appear to be saturated with species. The distributions and abundances of individual species provide little evidence of being shaped by competition from related (i.e. ecologically similar) species and, by inference, that diversification is constrained by interspecific competition.
Keywords: Competition; E. Lucy Braun; diversity limits; ecological space; forest trees; plot occupancy; species diversity; species-abundance distributions.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
References
-
- Alroy J. 2000. Successive approximations of diversity curves: ten more years in the library. Geology 28: 1023–1026.
-
- Barraclough TG, Vogler AP. 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. American Naturalist 155: 419–434. - PubMed
-
- Bever JD. 2003. Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytologist 157: 465–473. - PubMed
-
- Blackburn TM, Gaston KJ. 2001. Linking patterns in macroecology. Journal of Animal Ecology 70: 338–352.
-
- Blois JL, Gotelli NJ, Behrensmeyer AK, et al. 2014. A framework for evaluating the influence of climate, dispersal limitation, and biotic interactions using fossil pollen associations across the late Quaternary. Ecography 37: 1095–1108.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
