Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review
- PMID: 25851612
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13348
Dichorionic triplet pregnancies: risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery with fetal reduction versus expectant management. Outcomes of a cohort study and systematic review
Abstract
Background: In trichorionic pregnancies, fetal reduction from three to two lowers the risk of severe preterm delivery, but provides no advantage in survival. Similar data for dichorionic triamniotic (DCTA) triplets is not readily available.
Objectives: To document the natural history of DCTA triplets and the effect of reduction on the risk of miscarriage and severe preterm delivery, compared with expectant management.
Search strategy: Systematic search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library.
Selection criteria: DCTA triplets with three live fetuses at 8-14 weeks of gestation, outcome data with expectant management and/or reduction, miscarriage before 24 weeks of gestation and/or severe preterm delivery before 32-33 weeks of gestation.
Data collection and analysis: Five studies were included. Data from these were combined with data from three centres.
Main results: There were 331 DCTA triplets. The miscarriage rate was 8.9% (95% CI 5.8-13.3%) and the severe preterm delivery rate was 33.3% (95% CI 27.5-39.7%), with expectant management. The miscarriage rate was 14.5% (95% CI 7.6-26.2%) with a reduction of the monochorionic pair, 8.8% (95% CI 3.0-23.0%) with a reduction of one fetus of the monochorionic pair, and 23.5% (9.6-47.3%) with a reduction of the fetus with a separate placenta. Severe preterm delivery rates were 5.5% (95% CI 1.9-14-9%), 11.8% (95% CI 4.7-26.6%), and 17.6% (95% CI 6.2-41.0%), respectively.
Conclusions: In DCTA triplets, expectant management is a reasonable choice when the top priority is a liveborn infant. Where the priority is to minimise severe preterm delivery, the most advisable option is fetal reduction. Further studies are needed to clarify which particular technique is advisable to optimise the outcome.
Keywords: Dichorionic triplets; embryo reduction; fetal reduction; mixed chorionicity; selective termination; triplet pregnancy.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Comment in
-
First trimester dichorionic triplets: framing the choice.BJOG. 2015 Jul;122(8):1061. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13391. Epub 2015 Apr 9. BJOG. 2015. PMID: 25854507 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Risks of miscarriage or preterm delivery in trichorionic and dichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod. 2017 Jun 1;32(6):1351-1359. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex084. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28444191
-
Perinatal outcomes of fetoscopic laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome in triplet pregnancy: cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jul;60(1):42-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.24887. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35229918
-
Risks of miscarriage and early preterm birth in trichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: new data and systematic review.Hum Reprod. 2006 Jul;21(7):1912-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del048. Epub 2006 Apr 13. Hum Reprod. 2006. PMID: 16613889
-
Planned early delivery versus expectant management of the term suspected compromised baby for improving outcomes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Nov 24;2015(11):CD009433. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009433.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26599471 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar;(176):1-257. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009. PMID: 19408970 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of dichorionic and trichorionic triamniotic triplet pregnancy with multifetal pregnancy reduction: a retrospective analysis study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 5;22(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04617-y. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022. PMID: 35382798 Free PMC article.
-
Pregnancy outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic and dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive technology and conceived naturally: a study based on chorionic comparison.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 May 2;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06521-z. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 38698326 Free PMC article.
-
Intertwin nuchal translucency difference predicts the chance of co-twin death after fetal reduction in dichorionic triplet pregnancies: a retrospective analysis study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Oct 23;23(1):747. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06064-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37872490 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in triplet pregnancies in Sweden - a nationwide cohort study.Ups J Med Sci. 2023 Jul 17;128. doi: 10.48101/ujms.v128.9473. eCollection 2023. Ups J Med Sci. 2023. PMID: 37538405 Free PMC article.
-
Maternal, Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes of Triplet Pregnancies According to Chorionicity: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 28;11(7):1871. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071871. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35407479 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical