Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;45(12):2545-56.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291715000471. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

Familial risk for distress and fear disorders and emotional reactivity in adolescence: an event-related potential investigation

Affiliations

Familial risk for distress and fear disorders and emotional reactivity in adolescence: an event-related potential investigation

B D Nelson et al. Psychol Med. 2015.

Abstract

Background: The late positive potential (LPP) is an event-related potential component that is sensitive to the motivational salience of stimuli. Children with a parental history of depression, an indicator of risk, have been found to exhibit an attenuated LPP to emotional stimuli. Research on depressive and anxiety disorders has organized these conditions into two empirical classes: distress and fear disorders. The present study examined whether parental history of distress and fear disorders was associated with the LPP to emotional stimuli in a large sample of adolescent girls.

Method: The sample of 550 girls (ages 13.5-15.5 years) with no lifetime history of depression completed an emotional picture-viewing task and the LPP was measured in response to neutral, pleasant and unpleasant pictures. Parental lifetime history of psychopathology was determined via a semi-structured diagnostic interview with a biological parent, and confirmatory factor analysis was used to model distress and fear dimensions.

Results: Parental distress risk was associated with an attenuated LPP to all stimuli. In contrast, parental fear risk was associated with an enhanced LPP to unpleasant pictures but was unrelated to the LPP to neutral and pleasant pictures. Furthermore, these results were independent of the adolescent girls' current depression and anxiety symptoms and pubertal status.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrates that familial risk for distress and fear disorders may have unique profiles in terms of electrocortical measures of emotional information processing. This study is also one of the first to investigate emotional/motivational processes underlying the distress and fear disorder dimensions.

Keywords: Adolescence; distress; fear; late positive potential; risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Confirmatory factor analysis results for parental psychopathology. Short arrows indicate disorder-specific residual variances. Long arrows connecting factors to disorders are standardized loadings. Dep = major depressive disorder or dysthymia; GAD = generalized anxiety disorder; PD = panic disorder; PTSD = posttraumatic stress disorder; Social = social phobia; Spec = specific phobia.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Waveforms and head maps displaying the LPP for neutral, pleasant, and unpleasant stimuli. Waveforms were pooled across occipital (Oz, O1, O2) and parietal (Pz, P3, P4) regions. LPP = late positive potential; ms = milliseconds.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Waveforms and head maps displaying the LPP across all stimuli (neutral, pleasant, and unpleasant) for participants with no risk (left head map) and parental risk for depression (right head map). Electrodes were pooled across occipital (Oz, O1, O2) and parietal (Pz, P3, P4) regions. LPP = late positive potential; ms = milliseconds.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Head maps displaying correlation coefficients (Pearson’s r) between distress risk and the LPP to all stimuli (left) and fear risk and the LPP to unpleasant stimuli (right). LPP = late positive potential.

References

    1. Bar-Haim Y, Lamy D, Pergamin L, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH. Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin. 2007;133:1–24. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Behar E, DiMarco ID, Hekler EB, Mohlman J, Staples AM. Current theoretical models of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): Conceptual review and treatment implications. Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2009;23:1011–1023. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bittner A, Egger HL, Erkanli A, Costello EJ, Foley DL, Angold A. What do childhood anxiety disorders predict? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2007;48:1174–1183. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01812.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borkovec TD, Inz J. The nature of worry in generalized anxiety disorder: A predominance of thought activity. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1990;28:153–158. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90027-G. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2006.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources