Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 7;21(13):3888-92.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i13.3888.

Esophageal variceal pressure influence on the effect of ligation

Zhi-Qun Li  1 , En-Qiang LingHu  1 , Min Hu  1 , Wei-Min Li  1 , Qi-Yang Huang  1 , Yong-Wei Zhao  1
Affiliations

Esophageal variceal pressure influence on the effect of ligation

Zhi-Qun Li et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Aim: To explore the effect of in vitro porcine esophageal variceal pressure on complete ligation degree for polycyclic ligators.

Methods: An in vitro model of experimental porcine venous vessels was used to test various venous pressures. Three treatment groups were designated according to the preset pressure range: P1 = 25-30 cmH₂O; P₂ = 35-40 cmH₂O; P₃ = 45-50 cmH2O. The effect of pressure on ligation was assessed and compared among the groups.

Results: Complete ligation was achieved at a rate of 56.25% (18/32) in group P1, 37.5% (12/32) in group P₂, and 33.33% (11/33) in group P₃ (χ (2) = 3.6126; P = 0.0573).

Conclusion: Higher variceal pressures impair the ligation completion rate. Therefore, measuring variceal pressure may help predict the effect of endoscopic ligation and guide treatment choice.

Keywords: Endoscopic variceal ligation; Mold of animal; Variceal pressure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measuring venous pressure.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Established submucosal tunnel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
In vitro ligation model of pig esophageal varices and judgment of the effect. A: Ligation model; B: Complete ligation (100%); C: Partial ligation (≤ 50%); D: No ligation (0%).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lei YL, Wang Y, Wang LP. A Case-control Study on the Influencing Factors of Rebleeding after Esophageal Variceal Ligation. Xiandai Shengwu Yixue Jinzhan. 2013;12:2318–2320.
    1. Li ZQ, Linghu EQ, Li WM. Effects of different vascular diameter and pressure on complete ligation degree in vitro. Zhonghua Xiaohuaneijing Zazhi. 2014;31:93–96.
    1. Wang GF, Xie H. Nursing care in treatment of esophageal variceal ligation. Zhongguo Linchuang Yixue Yanjiu. 2007;13:1039.
    1. Liu M, Wang L, Pu LX. The clinical application of a new self-made of pneumatic ligator. Zhonghua Neijing Zazhi. 2002;8:48–49.
    1. Nevens F, Broeckaert L, Rutgeerts P, Van Steenbergen W, Fevery J. The long-term morbidity and mortality rate in a cohort of patients with liver cirrhosis and oesophageal varices. Hepatogastroenterology. 1995;42:979–984. - PubMed

Publication types