Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 5:15:30.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0311-8.

A systematic review of factors influencing student ratings in undergraduate medical education course evaluations

A systematic review of factors influencing student ratings in undergraduate medical education course evaluations

Sarah Schiekirka et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Student ratings are a popular source of course evaluations in undergraduate medical education. Data on the reliability and validity of such ratings have mostly been derived from studies unrelated to medical education. Since medical education differs considerably from other higher education settings, an analysis of factors influencing overall student ratings with a specific focus on medical education was needed.

Methods: For the purpose of this systematic review, online databases (PubMed, PsycInfo and Web of Science) were searched up to August 1st, 2013. Original research articles on the use of student ratings in course evaluations in undergraduate medical education were eligible for inclusion. Included studies considered the format of evaluation tools and assessed the association of independent and dependent (i.e., overall course ratings) variables. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were checked by two independent reviewers, and results were synthesised in a narrative review.

Results: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Qualitative research (2 studies) indicated that overall course ratings are mainly influenced by student satisfaction with teaching and exam difficulty rather than objective determinants of high quality teaching. Quantitative research (23 studies) yielded various influencing factors related to four categories: student characteristics, exposure to teaching, satisfaction with examinations and the evaluation process itself. Female gender, greater initial interest in course content, higher exam scores and higher satisfaction with exams were associated with more positive overall course ratings.

Conclusions: Due to the heterogeneity and methodological limitations of included studies, results must be interpreted with caution. Medical educators need to be aware of various influences on student ratings when developing data collection instruments and interpreting evaluation results. More research into the reliability and validity of overall course ratings as typically used in the evaluation of undergraduate medical education is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart of the study selection and exclusion process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gibson KA, Boyle P, Black DA, Cunningham M, Grimm MC, McNeil HP. Enhancing Evaluation in an Undergraduate Medical Education Program. Acad Med. 2008;83:787–93. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31817eb8ab. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berk RA. Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness. Med Teach. 2013;35:15–26. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.732247. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scott CS, Hunt DD, Greig LM. Changes in course ratings following clinical experiences in the clerkship years. J Med Educ. 1986;61:764–6. - PubMed
    1. Kogan JR, Shea JA. Course evaluation in medical education. Teach Teach Educ. 2007;23:251–64. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.020. - DOI
    1. Billings-Gagliardi S, Barrett SV, Mazor KM. Interpreting course evaluation results: insights from thinkaloud interviews with medical students. Med Educ. 2004;38:1061–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01953.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources