Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;51(1):32-47.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12307. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

Health Information Technology Adoption in the Emergency Department

Frederic W Selck  1 , Sandra L Decker  2
Affiliations

Health Information Technology Adoption in the Emergency Department

Frederic W Selck et al. Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the trend in health information technology (IT) systems adoption in hospital emergency departments (EDs) and its effect on ED efficiency and resource use.

Data sources: 2007-2010 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey - ED Component.

Study design: We assessed changes in the percent of visits to EDs with health IT capability and the estimated effect on waiting time to see a provider, visit length, and resource use.

Principal findings: The percent of ED visits that took place in an ED with at least a basic health IT or an advanced IT system increased from 25.2 and 3.1 percent in 2007 to 69.1 and 30.6 percent in 2010, respectively (p < .05). Controlling for ED fixed effects, waiting times were reduced by 6.0 minutes in advanced IT-equipped EDs (p < .05), and the number of tests ordered increased by 9 percent (p < .01). In models using a 1-year lag, advanced systems also showed an increase in the number of medications and images ordered per visit.

Conclusions: Almost a third of visits now occur in EDs with advanced IT capability. While advanced IT adoption may decrease wait times, resource use during ED visits may also increase depending on how long the system has been in place. We were not able to determine if these changes indicated more appropriate care.

Keywords: Information technology in health; ambulatory care; hospital emergency departments.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agha, L. 2012. “The Effects of Health Information Technology on the Costs and Quality of Medical Care.” Journal of Health Economics 34: 19–30. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blumenthal, D. 2009. “Stimulating the Adoption of Health Information Technology.” New England Journal of Medicine 360: 1477–9. - PubMed
    1. Daniel, G. W. , Ewen E., Willey V. J., Reese C. L., Shirazi F., and Malone D. C.. 2010. “Efficiency and Economic Benefit of a Payer‐Based Electronic Health Record in an Emergency Department.” Academic Emergency Medicine 17: 824–33. - PubMed
    1. Decker, S. L. , Jamoom E. W., and Sisk J. E.. 2012. “Physicians in Nonprimary Care and Small Practices and Those Age 55 and Older Lag in Adopting Electronic Health Record Systems.” Health Affairs 31 (5): 1108–14. - PubMed
    1. DesRoches, C. M. , Campbell E. G., Rao S. R., Donelan K., Ferris T. G., Jha A., Kaushal R., Levy D. E., Rosenbaum S., Shields A. E., and Blumenthal D.. 2008. “Electronic Health Records in Ambulatory Care—A National Survey of Physicians.” New England Journal of Medicine 359: 50–60. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources