Adding fentanyl to etomidate fails to reduce painful recall of external direct current cardioversion in adults: a randomised trial
- PMID: 25854443
Adding fentanyl to etomidate fails to reduce painful recall of external direct current cardioversion in adults: a randomised trial
Abstract
Introduction: External electrical cardioversion under hypnotics, even when combined with opioids, has been consistently described as distressing or painful. The main objective of the present study was to determine if adding an opioid to a hypnotic, in comparison to the same hypnotic alone, would decrease the incidence of unpleasant or painful recall during anaesthesia for external electrical cardioversion.
Methods: This was a single-centre, prospective, randomised, double-blinded clinical trial that took place from September 2011 to March 2012. Fifty-two adult patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, scheduled for external direct current cardioversion, were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were age >80 years, previous cardiac surgery, implanted pacemaker or defibrillator, and haemodynamic instability. Patients received intravenously either (group EF) fentanyl 50 g and after 60 s etomidate 0.1 mg/kg, or (group E) only etomidate 0.1 mg/kg. If the patients did not lose their eyelid reflex, repeated doses of etomidate 4 mg were given. Cardioversion was attempted with an extracardiac biphasic electrical shock from 200 to 300 J, at most three times. The primary endpoint was recall of something unpleasant or painful. Secondary outcome measures were predictors of the requirement for repeat doses of etomidate, and the number of shocks needed.
Results: Fifty-one patients (35 male, 16 female), aged 62.1 ± 10.2 years, completed the study. There were no differences between group EF and group E regarding recall (unpleasant recall 0 vs. 2 patients, p=0.235; painful recall 1 vs. 0 patients, p=0.510). The administration of etomidate alone was a significant predictor for subsequent repeated doses of etomidate (p=0.049, odds ratio 4.312, 95% confidence interval 1.007-18.460). The number of shocks needed to restore sinus rhythm did not differ between the groups (p=0.846).
Conclusions: In the present study, the addition of fentanyl to etomidate did not diminish distressing or painful experience during anaesthesia for external cardioversion.
Similar articles
-
Anaesthesia for cardioversion: a prospective randomised comparison of propofol and etomidate combined with fentanyl.Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011 Nov-Dec;52(6):483-8. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011. PMID: 22143010 Clinical Trial.
-
Ambulatory electrical external cardioversion with propofol or etomidate.J Clin Anesth. 2003 Mar;15(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00520-2. J Clin Anesth. 2003. PMID: 12719046 Clinical Trial.
-
Cardioversion: What to choose? Etomidate or propofol.Ann Card Anaesth. 2015 Jul-Sep;18(3):306-11. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.159798. Ann Card Anaesth. 2015. PMID: 26139733 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Oesophageal electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2004 Apr;52(2):73-80. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2004. PMID: 15194990 Review. English, Italian.
-
Low-energy internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation after failed external cardioversion: Texas Heart Institute experience and review of the literature.Tex Heart Inst J. 1999;26(2):114-9. Tex Heart Inst J. 1999. PMID: 10397433 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of ketamine/propofol (ketofol) and etomidate/fentanyl (etofen) combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department: An observational study.Turk J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar 19;17(3):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.tjem.2017.01.003. eCollection 2017 Sep. Turk J Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 28971155 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical