Clinical decision-making of cardiologists regarding admission and treatment of patients with suspected unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: protocol of a clinical vignette study
- PMID: 25854966
- PMCID: PMC4390690
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006441
Clinical decision-making of cardiologists regarding admission and treatment of patients with suspected unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: protocol of a clinical vignette study
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiologists face the difficult task of rapidly distinguishing cardiac-related chest pain from other conditions, and to thoroughly consider whether invasive diagnostic procedures or treatments are indicated. The use of cardiac risk-scoring instruments has been recommended in international cardiac guidelines. However, it is unknown to what degree cardiac risk scores and other clinical information influence cardiologists' decision-making. This paper describes the development of a binary choice experiment using realistic descriptions of clinical cases. The study aims to determine the importance cardiologists put on different types of clinical information, including cardiac risk scores, when deciding on the management of patients with suspected unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Methods and analysis: Cardiologists were asked, in a nationwide survey, to weigh different clinical factors in decision-making regarding patient admission and treatment using realistic descriptions of patients in which specific characteristics are varied in a systematic way (eg, web-based clinical vignettes). These vignettes represent patients with suspected unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Associations between several clinical characteristics, with cardiologists' management decisions, will be analysed using generalised linear mixed models.
Ethics and dissemination: The study has received ethics approval and informed consent will be obtained from all participating cardiologists. The results of the study will provide insight into the relative importance of cardiac risk scores and other clinical information in cardiac decision-making. Further, the results indicate cardiologists' adherence to the European Society of Cardiology guideline recommendations. In addition, the detailed description of the method of vignette development applied in this study could assist other researchers or clinicians in creating future choice experiments.
Keywords: acute coronary syndromes; case scenarios; decision making; risk assesment.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Selecting patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome for coronary angiography: a nationwide clinical vignette study in the Netherlands.BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 19;7(1):e011213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011213. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28104706 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Understanding factors that influence the use of risk scoring instruments in the management of patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Netherlands: a qualitative study of health care practitioners' perceptions.BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 22;14:418. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-418. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014. PMID: 25242347 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK).Eur Heart J. 2000 Sep;21(17):1450-7. doi: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1995. Eur Heart J. 2000. PMID: 10952837
-
[Mexican Cardiology Society Guidelines on the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Cancún, Quintana Roo 15-16 November 2002. Cooperative Group of Consensus].Arch Cardiol Mex. 2002 Oct-Dec;72 Suppl 2:S5-44. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2002. PMID: 12661524 Review. Spanish.
-
[Myocardial infarct and unstable angina pectoris: diagnostics and therapy].Internist (Berl). 2007 Apr;48(4):399-410; quiz 411-2. doi: 10.1007/s00108-007-1802-4. Internist (Berl). 2007. PMID: 17333052 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Nurse Practitioner Knowledge of Symptoms of Acute Coronary Syndrome.J Nurse Pract. 2019 Jan;15(1):e9-e12. doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Nov 3. J Nurse Pract. 2019. PMID: 31354392 Free PMC article.
-
Blood Pressure Sensors: Materials, Fabrication Methods, Performance Evaluations and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 11;20(16):4484. doi: 10.3390/s20164484. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32796604 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selecting patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome for coronary angiography: a nationwide clinical vignette study in the Netherlands.BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 19;7(1):e011213. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011213. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28104706 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Determinants of treatment duration in the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: a protocol for a balanced vignette experiment.BMJ Open. 2017 May 10;7(5):e015231. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015231. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28495816 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a prescription support-tool for chronic management of oral antithrombotic combinations in adults using clinical vignettes: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 9;9(6):e025544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025544. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31182442 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical