Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1989 Oct;18(6):283-8.

Assessment of laryngeal cancer: CT scan versus endoscopy

Affiliations
  • PMID: 2585592

Assessment of laryngeal cancer: CT scan versus endoscopy

B Charlin et al. J Otolaryngol. 1989 Oct.

Abstract

In order to assess the value of the systematic use of CT scan in the workup for laryngeal cancer, a retrospective study was conducted on 66 consecutive previously untreated cases of laryngeal cancer. Endoscopic and CT scan findings were systematically compared. The areas of particular difficulty in CT scan assessment are described. CT scan alone understaged laryngeal cancers in 10.6% of cases, all of them being superficial spreading tumors within the larynx or in the juxtalaryngeal areas. CT scan worsened the staging in 22.7% of cases, all of them being deep invasions overlooked by endoscopy. CT was most useful in lesions initially classified as T2 and T3, which included all those reclassified by CT. None of the T1 lesions was upgraded after CT, and systematic use of CT for this stage is not warranted. CT scan workup changed the therapeutic attitude in 10 of the 66 patients (15.1%), causing a switch to conservative surgery in seven patients and total laryngectomy with radiotherapy for the three others. CT was also valuable in choosing the most suitable technique for conservation surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms