Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;36(8):1450-6.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4299. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

How Does the Accuracy of Intracranial Volume Measurements Affect Normalized Brain Volumes? Sample Size Estimates Based on 966 Subjects from the HUNT MRI Cohort

T I Hansen  1 , V Brezova  1 , L Eikenes  2 , A Håberg  1 , T R Vangberg  3
Affiliations

How Does the Accuracy of Intracranial Volume Measurements Affect Normalized Brain Volumes? Sample Size Estimates Based on 966 Subjects from the HUNT MRI Cohort

T I Hansen et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The intracranial volume is commonly used for correcting regional brain volume measurements for variations in head size. Accurate intracranial volume measurements are important because errors will be propagated to the corrected regional brain volume measurements, possibly leading to biased data or decreased power. Our aims were to describe a fully automatic SPM-based method for estimating the intracranial volume and to explore the practical implications of different methods for obtaining the intracranial volume and normalization methods on statistical power.

Materials and methods: We describe a method for calculating the intracranial volume that can use either T1-weighted or both T1- and T2-weighted MR images. The accuracy of the method was compared with manual measurements and automatic estimates by FreeSurfer and SPM-based methods. Sample size calculations on intracranial volume-corrected regional brain volumes with intracranial volume estimates from FreeSurfer, SPM, and our proposed method were used to explore the benefits of accurate intracranial volume estimates.

Results: The proposed method for estimating the intracranial volume compared favorably with the other methods evaluated here, with mean and absolute differences in manual measurements of -0.1% and 2.2%, respectively, and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 when using T1-weighted images. Using both T1- and T2-weighted images for estimating the intracranial volume slightly improved the accuracy. Sample size calculations showed that both the accuracy of intracranial volume estimates and the method for correcting the regional volume measurements affected the sample size.

Conclusions: Accurate intracranial volume estimates are most important for ratio-corrected regional brain volumes, for which our proposed method can provide increased power in intracranial volume-corrected regional brain volume data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Bland-Altman plots show the ICV difference (manual-automatic) plotted against the mean of the 2 measurements. Units are in milliliters. The dotted horizontal lines are 2 SDs above and below the mean, and the solid line is the best-fit line from the regression of the difference on the mean.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Effect size in percentage difference from the mean plotted against the sample size per group for uncorrected hippocampal volumes and ICV-corrected hippocampal volumes by using FreeSurfer and ARBM ICV estimates.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
The relationship between sample size estimates for detecting a 2% difference from the mean and Pearson's r between uncorrected regional volumes and ICV estimates.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Barnes J, Ridgway GR, Bartlett J, et al. . Head size, age and gender adjustment in MRI studies: a necessary nuisance? Neuroimage 2010;53:1244–55 - PubMed
    1. Davis PJ, Wright EA. A new method for measuring cranial cavity volume and its application to the assessment of cerebral atrophy at autopsy. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1977;3:341–58
    1. Buckner RL, Head D, Parker J, et al. . A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume. Neuroimage 2004;23:724–38 - PubMed
    1. Keihaninejad S, Heckemann RA, Fagiolo G, et al. . A robust method to estimate the intracranial volume across MRI field strengths (1.5T and 3T). Neuroimage 2010;50:1427–37 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nordenskjöld R, Malmberg F, Larsson EM, et al. . Intracranial volume estimated with commonly used methods could introduce bias in studies including brain volume measurements. Neuroimage 2013;83:355–60 - PubMed

Publication types