Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;56(6):877-83.
doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154807. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

Clinical Assessment of Emission- and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging

Affiliations
Free article

Clinical Assessment of Emission- and Segmentation-Based MR-Guided Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging

Abolfazl Mehranian et al. J Nucl Med. 2015 Jun.
Free article

Abstract

The joint maximum-likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) for emission-based attenuation correction has regained attention since the advent of time-of-flight PET/MR imaging. Recently, we improved the performance of the MLAA algorithm using an MR imaging-constrained gaussian mixture model (GMM). In this study, we compare the performance of our proposed algorithm with standard 4-class MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) implemented on commercial systems.

Methods: Five head and neck (18)F-FDG patients were scanned on PET/MR imaging and PET/CT scanners. Dixon fat and water MR images were registered to CT images. MRAC maps were derived by segmenting the MR images into 4 tissue classes and assigning predefined attenuation coefficients. For MLAA-GMM, MR images were segmented into known tissue classes, including fat, soft tissue, lung, background air, and an unknown MR low-intensity class encompassing cortical bones, air cavities, and metal artifacts. A coregistered bone probability map was also included in the unknown tissue class. Finally, the GMM prior was constrained over known tissue classes of attenuation maps using unimodal gaussians parameterized over a patient population.

Results: The results showed that the MLAA-GMM algorithm outperformed the MRAC method by differentiating bones from air gaps and providing more accurate patient-specific attenuation coefficients of soft tissue and lungs. It was found that the MRAC and MLAA-GMM methods resulted in average standardized uptake value errors of -5.4% and -3.5% in the lungs, -7.4% and -5.0% in soft tissues/lesions, and -18.4% and -10.2% in bones, respectively.

Conclusion: The proposed MLAA algorithm is promising for accurate derivation of attenuation maps on time-of-flight PET/MR systems.

Keywords: PET/MRI; attenuation correction; quantification; time-of-flight; whole-body imaging.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources