Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul;98(7):884-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Mar 30.

Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: The effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya

Joelle I Rosser  1 , Betty Njoroge  2 , Megan J Huchko  3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: The effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya

Joelle I Rosser et al. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: Cervical cancer screening uptake may be influenced by inadequate knowledge in resource-limited settings. This randomized trial evaluated a health talk's impact on cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening rates in rural Kenya.

Methods: 419 women attending government clinics were randomized to an intervention (N=207) or control (N=212) group. The intervention was a brief health talk on cervical cancer. Participants completed surveys at enrollment (all), immediately after the talk (intervention arm), and at three-months follow-up (all). The primary outcomes were the change in knowledge scores and the final screening rates at three-months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were changes in awareness about cervical cancer screening, perception of personal cervical cancer risk, cervical cancer and HIV stigma, and screening acceptability.

Results: Mean Knowledge Scores increased by 26.4% (8.7 points increased to 11.0 points) in the intervention arm compared to only 17.6% (8.5 points increased to 10.0 points) in the control arm (p<0.01). Screening uptake was moderate in both the intervention (58.9%; N=122) and control (60.9%; N=129) arms, with no difference between the groups (p=0.60).

Conclusion: A brief health talk increased cervical cancer knowledge, although it did not increase screening over simply informing women about free screening.

Practical implications: Screening programs can increase patient understanding with just a brief educational intervention.

Keywords: Behavior; Cervical cancer screening; Health education; Knowledge; Risk perception; Sub-Saharan Africa.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest:

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant Flow Chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Mar-Apr;61(2):69–90. - PubMed
    1. Louie KS, de Sanjose S, Mayaud P. Epidemiology and prevention of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer in sub-Saharan Africa: a comprehensive review. Trop Med Int Health. 2009 Oct;14(10):1287–1302. - PubMed
    1. Francis SA, Nelson J, Liverpool J, Soogun S, Mofammere N, Thorpe RJ., Jr Examining attitudes and knowledge about HPV and cervical cancer risk among female clinic attendees in Johannesburg, South Africa. Vaccine. 2010 Nov 23;28(50):8026–8032. - PubMed
    1. Hoque M, Hoque E, Kader SB. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa. East African journal of public health. 2008 Aug;5(2):111–116. - PubMed
    1. McFarland DM. Cervical cancer and Pap smear screening in Botswana: knowledge and perceptions. Int Nurs Rev. 2003 Sep;50(3):167–175. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms