Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;24(2):240-265.
doi: 10.1111/sode.12083.

Emotion Knowledge, Loneliness, Negative Social Experiences, and Internalizing Symptoms Among Low-Income Preschoolers

Affiliations

Emotion Knowledge, Loneliness, Negative Social Experiences, and Internalizing Symptoms Among Low-Income Preschoolers

Justin E Heinze et al. Soc Dev. 2015 May.

Abstract

Children with poor emotion knowledge (EK) skills are at risk for externalizing problems; less is known about early internalizing behavior. We examined multiple facets of EK and social-emotional experiences relevant for internalizing difficulties, including loneliness, victimization, and peer rejection, in Head Start preschoolers (N = 134; M = 60 months). Results based on multiple informants suggest that facets of EK are differentially related to negative social-emotional experiences and internalizing behavior and that sex plays a moderating role. Behavioral EK was associated with self-reported loneliness, victimization/rejection, and parent-reported internalizing symptoms. Emotion recognition and expressive emotion knowledge were related to self-reported loneliness, and emotion situation knowledge was related to parent-reported internalizing symptoms and negative peer nominations. Sex moderated many of these associations, suggesting that EK may operate differently for girls versus boys in the preschool social context. Results are discussed with regard to the role of EK for social development and intervention implications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Association between emotion recognition knowledge and self-reported loneliness in boys and girls. Higher values indicate more feelings of loneliness.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Association between expressive emotion knowledge and self-reported loneliness in boys and girls. Higher values indicate more feelings of loneliness.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Association between expressive emotion knowledge and parent-reported internalizing in boys and girls. Higher values indicate more internalizing behaviors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Association between emotion situation knowledge and parent-reported internalizing in boys and girls. Higher values indicate more internalizing behaviors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Association between emotion situation knowledge and peer negative nominations in boys and girls. Higher values indicate more negative nominations.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Association between behavioral emotion knowledge and parent-reported internalizing in boys and girls. Higher values indicate more internalizing behaviors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aber L, Morris P, Raver C. Children, families and poverty: Definitions, trends, emerging science and implications for policy. Social Policy Report: Publication of the Society for Research in Child Development. 2012 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Achenbach TM, Rescorla LA. Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families; 2001.
    1. Arsenio WF, Cooperman S, Lover A. Affective predictors of preschoolers' aggression and peer acceptance: Direct and indirect effects. Developmental Psychology. 2000;36:438–448. - PubMed
    1. Asher SR, Rose AJ, Gabriel SW. Peer rejection in everyday life. In: Leary MR, editor. Interpersonal rejection. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 105–142.
    1. Barrett LF, Gross J, Christensen TC, Benvenuto M. Knowing what you're feeling and knowing what to do about it: Mapping the relation between emotion differentiation and emotion regulation. Cognition & Emotion. 2001;15:713–724.