Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 25:5:72.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00072. eCollection 2015.

Psychological intervention for improving cognitive function in cancer survivors: a literature review and randomized controlled trial

Summer King  1 , Heather Joy Green  1
Affiliations

Psychological intervention for improving cognitive function in cancer survivors: a literature review and randomized controlled trial

Summer King et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Although the impact of cancer and associated treatments on cognitive functioning is becoming an increasingly recognized problem, there are few published studies that have investigated psychological interventions to address this issue. A waitlist randomized controlled trial methodology was used to assess the efficacy of a group cognitive rehabilitation intervention ("ReCog") that successfully targeted cancer-related cognitive decline in previously published pilot research. Participants were 29 cancer survivors who were randomly allocated to either the intervention group or a waitlist group who received the intervention at a later date, and 16 demographically matched community volunteers with no history of cancer (trial registration ACTRN12615000009516, available at http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12615000009516.aspx). The study was the first to include an adapted version of the Traumatic Brain Injury Self-Efficacy Scale to assess cognitive self-efficacy (CSE) in people who have experienced cancer. Results revealed participating in the intervention was associated with significantly faster performance on one objective cognitive task that measures processing speed and visual scanning. Significantly larger improvements for the intervention group were also found on measures of perceived cognitive impairments and CSE. There was some evidence to support the roles of CSE and illness perceptions as potential mechanisms of change for the intervention. Overall, the study provided additional evidence of feasibility and efficacy of group psychological intervention for targeting cancer-related cognitive decline.

Keywords: cancer; cognitive function; cognitive rehabilitation; group; randomized controlled trial; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Janelsins MC, Kohli S, Mohile SG, Usuki K, Ahles TA, Morrow GR. An update on cancer- and chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction: current status. Semin Oncol (2011) 38(3):431–8.10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.03.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poppelreuter M, Weis J, Kulz AK, Tucha O, Lange KW, Bartsch HH. Cognitive dysfunction and subjective complaints of cancer patients. A cross-sectional study in a cancer rehabilitation centre. Eur J Cancer (2004) 40(1):43–9.10.1016/j.ejca.2003.08.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wefel JS, Schagen SB. Chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep (2012) 12(3):267–75.10.1007/s11910-012-0264-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ. Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes. Nat Rev Cancer (2007) 7(3):192–201.10.1038/nrc2073 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietrich J, Monje M, Wefel J, Meyers C. Clinical patterns and biological correlates of cognitive dysfunction associated with cancer therapy. Oncologist (2008) 13(12):1285–95.10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0130 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources