Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Apr;24(4):324-8.
doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4994.

Enhancing referral of sexually active adolescent females from the emergency department to family planning

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Enhancing referral of sexually active adolescent females from the emergency department to family planning

Lauren S Chernick et al. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Female adolescents at high pregnancy risk frequently visit the emergency department (ED) and lack primary providers. It is unclear if current methods of ED referral are successful. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the potential effect and feasibility of a standardized, enhanced method of referral of sexually active females from an ED for family planning (FP).

Methods: We conducted an ED-based intervention study using an enhanced referral process, which included a wallet card advertising a walk-in, adolescent-friendly FP clinic and a standardized ED physician monologue. ED physicians were instructed to disseminate the enhanced process to sexually active females ages 12-19 years (intervention group). Patients receiving the intervention were prospectively enrolled. The control group consisted of patients who, on retrospective review, came to the ED during the enrollment period and were eligible but were not enrolled. We used the electronic medical record (EMR) to identify and randomly select missed eligible patients (control group) and accumulated one control for each case. The primary outcome was FP follow-up within 2 months, measured by EMR review.

Results: The intervention (n=101) and control groups (n=101) were similar in age, prior ED visits (54% versus 56%), and previous FP visits (28% versus 28%). The absolute difference in follow-up to a FP clinic between the enhanced referral group (7%; 7/101) compared with the nonenhanced referral group (5%; 5/101) was only 2% (95% confidence interval -5% to 9%). Feasibility of the intervention was modest, with a best-case scenario of 59/160 (37%) of eligible patients captured.

Conclusions: An enhanced referral initiative relying on physician participation did not substantially increase follow-up rates to a FP clinic and showed modest feasibility. More research is required to identify effective means of ED-based referral for preventive reproductive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources