Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 10;10(4):e0119929.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119929. eCollection 2015.

Flooding and mental health: a systematic mapping review

Ana Fernandez  1 , John Black  2 , Mairwen Jones  3 , Leigh Wilson  4 , Luis Salvador-Carulla  1 , Thomas Astell-Burt  4 , Deborah Black  2
Affiliations

Flooding and mental health: a systematic mapping review

Ana Fernandez et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Floods are the most common type of global natural disaster. Floods have a negative impact on mental health. Comprehensive evaluation and review of the literature are lacking.

Objective: To systematically map and review available scientific evidence on mental health impacts of floods caused by extended periods of heavy rain in river catchments.

Methods: We performed a systematic mapping review of published scientific literature in five languages for mixed studies on floods and mental health. PUBMED and Web of Science were searched to identify all relevant articles from 1994 to May 2014 (no restrictions).

Results: The electronic search strategy identified 1331 potentially relevant papers. Finally, 83 papers met the inclusion criteria. Four broad areas are identified: i) the main mental health disorders-post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and anxiety; ii] the factors associated with mental health among those affected by floods; iii) the narratives associated with flooding, which focuses on the long-term impacts of flooding on mental health as a consequence of the secondary stressors; and iv) the management actions identified. The quantitative and qualitative studies have consistent findings. However, very few studies have used mixed methods to quantify the size of the mental health burden as well as exploration of in-depth narratives. Methodological limitations include control of potential confounders and short-term follow up.

Limitations: Floods following extreme events were excluded from our review.

Conclusions: Although the level of exposure to floods has been systematically associated with mental health problems, the paucity of longitudinal studies and lack of confounding controls precludes strong conclusions.

Implications: We recommend that future research in this area include mixed-method studies that are purposefully designed, using more rigorous methods. Studies should also focus on vulnerable groups and include analyses of policy and practical responses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flow Diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Conceptual Map.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Alderman K, Turner LR, Tong S. Floods and human health: a systematic review. Environ Int. 2012;47:37–47. 10.1016/j.envint.2012.06.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Doocy S, Daniels A, Murray S, Kirsch TD. The human impact of floods: a historical review of events 1980–2009 and systematic literature review. PLoS currents. 2013;5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Group NFRA. Flood Risk Management in Australia. 2008 Contract No.: 4.
    1. Stefan W. The Angry Summer: Report of the Climate Change Institue. In: Change DoEaC, editor. 2013.
    1. Stanke C, Murray V, Amlot R, Nurse J, Williams R. The effects of flooding on mental health: Outcomes and recommendations from a review of the literature. PLoS Curr. 2012;4:e4f9f1fa9c3cae. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types