Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar 24:8:13-9.
doi: 10.4137/CMED.S20906. eCollection 2015.

Health economic evaluation of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice focused review

Affiliations
Review

Health economic evaluation of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a clinical practice focused review

Andreas Liebl et al. Clin Med Insights Endocrinol Diabetes. .

Abstract

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) is a growing healthcare burden primarily due to long-term complications. Strict glycemic control helps in preventing complications, and early introduction of insulin may be more cost-effective than maintaining patients on multiple oral agents. This is an expert opinion review based on English peer-reviewed articles (2000-2012) to discuss the health economic consequences of T2D treatment intensification. T2D costs are driven by inpatient care for treatment of diabetes complications (40%-60% of total cost), with drug therapy for glycemic control representing 18% of the total cost. Insulin therapy provides the most improved glycemic control and reduction of complications, although hypoglycemia and weight gain may occur. Early treatment intensification with insulin analogs in patients with poor glycemic control appears to be cost-effective and improves clinical outcomes.

Keywords: cost-effectiveness; healthcare economics (operational domain); hyperglycemia; hypoglycemia; insulin; oral antidiabetic agents; type 2 diabetes (clinical domain).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of T2D-related annual costs (UK). Notes: Percent of patients with various complications: microvascular, 24% (eye problems, kidney damage, amputation, foot or leg ulcer); macrovascular, 12% (stroke, heart attack); none, 57%. *Includes delivery systems (pens, cartridges). Figure produced with data from Bottomley JM. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis. 2001 (T2ARDIS study).

References

    1. Farag YM, Gaballa MR. Diabesity: an overview of a rising epidemic. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(1):28–35. - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization . Diabetes Factsheet. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
    1. Gillies CL, Lambert PC, Abrams KR, et al. Different strategies for screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ. 2008;336(7654):1180–1185. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Currie CJ, Gale EA, Poole CD. Estimation of primary care treatment costs and treatment efficacy for people with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes in the United Kingdom from 1997 to 2007*. Diabet Med. 2010;27(8):938–948. - PubMed
    1. Massi-Benedetti M. The cost of diabetes Type II in Europe: the CODE-2 Study. Diabetologia. 2002;45(7):S1–S4. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources