Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb:54:84-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Apr 3.

Use of a facilitated discussion model for antenatal care to improve communication

Jody R Lori  1 , Michelle L Munro  2 , Meagan R Chuey  3
Affiliations

Use of a facilitated discussion model for antenatal care to improve communication

Jody R Lori et al. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Achieving health literacy is a critical step to improving health outcomes and the health of a nation. However, there is a lack of research on health literacy in low-resource countries, where maternal health outcomes are at their worst.

Objectives: To examine the usefulness and feasibility of providing focused antenatal care (FANC) in a group setting using picture cards to improve patient-provider communication, patient engagement, and improve health literacy.

Design: An exploratory, mixed methods design was employed to gather pilot data using the Health Literacy Skills Framework.

Settings: A busy urban district hospital in the Ashanti Region of Ghana was used to gather data during 2014.

Participants: A facility-driven convenience sample of midwives (n=6) aged 18 years or older, who could speak English or Twi, and had provided antenatal care at the participating hospital during the previous year prior to the start of the study participated in the study.

Methods: Data were collected using pre-test and post-test surveys, completed three months after the group FANC was implemented. A semi-structured focus group was conducted with four of the participating midwives and the registered nurse providing support and supervision for the study (n=5) at the time of the post-test. Data were analyzed concurrently to gain a broad understanding of patient communication, engagement, and group FANC.

Results: There were no significant differences in the mean communication (t(df=3)=0.541, p=0.626) and engagement (t(df=3)=-0.775, p=0.495) scores between the pre- and post-test. However, the focus group revealed the following themes: (a) improved communication through the use of picture cards; (b) enhanced information sharing and peer support through the facilitated group process and; and (c) an improved understanding of patient concerns.

Conclusions: The improved communication noted through the use of picture cards and the enhanced information sharing and peer support elicited through the group FANC undoubtedly provided patients with additional tools to invoke self-determination, and carry out the behaviors they thought were most important to improve pregnancy outcomes.

Keywords: Africa; Antenatal care; Communication; Focused antenatal care; Ghana; Group care; Health literacy; Maternal health; Midwifery; Mixed methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of Take Action Cards for Prevent Problems During Pregnancy
Figure 2
Figure 2
Modified Theoretical Framework – Maternal Health Literacy Skills Framework *Original model was developed by Squiers et al. (2012) **Red boxes indicate changes to the framework
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . Health literacy. Medline Plus, U.S. National Library of Medicine. National Institutes of Health; 2014. Retrieved from http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/healthliteracy.html.
    1. Althabe F, Bergel E, Cafferata ML, Gibbons L, Ciapponi A, Alèman A, Palacios AR. Strategies for improving the quality of health care in maternal and child health in low- and middle-income countries: An overview of systematic reviews. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2008;22(S1):42–60. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00912.x. - PubMed
    1. Berkman ND, Dewalt DA, Pignone MP, Sheridan SL, Lohr KN, Lux L, Sutton SF, Swinson T, Bonito AJ. Literacy and health outcomes: Summary. In: AHRQ Evidence Report Summaries. 2004;87 Retrieved from http://www-ncbi-nlm-nihgov.proxy.lib.umich.edu/books/NBK11942/ - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berkman ND, Davis TC, McCormack L. Health literacy: What is it? Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives. 2010;15(S2):9–19. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.499985. - PubMed
    1. Center for Disease Control ¡Cuídate! Monitoring & Evaluation Field Guide. 2015 Retrieved from https://effectiveinterventions.cdc.gov/en/HighImpactPrevention/Intervent....

Publication types