Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;85(6):1376-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.025. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

Priapism Impact Profile Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation

Affiliations

Priapism Impact Profile Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation

Arthur L Burnett et al. Urology. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To create and evaluate a psychometric instrument that measures the impact of experiencing priapism from the patient perspective.

Methods: The research protocol consisted of several phases as follows: (1) generating items, (2) composing a patient questionnaire, (3) administering the questionnaire to patients with both active and remitted (≥1 year without priapism episodes) histories of priapism, (4) performing internal consistency and criterion-oriented validity analyses in correlation with clinical histories and erectile function assessment tools, and (5) ascertaining psychometric properties of the instrument.

Results: The final instrument comprised a 12-item Priapism Impact Profile (PIP) questionnaire, representing the following 3 domains adversely impacted by priapism: quality of life (QoL), sexual function (SF), and physical wellness (PW), with higher scores indicating inferior experience in respective domains. Internal consistency reliability coefficients for the total PIP score and the 3 domain scores were >0.75. Fifty-four patients (mean age, 31.7 ± 11.4 years) completed the questionnaire. Patients with active priapism (n = 42) had higher total, QoL, SF, and PW scores than those with priapism remission (n = 8; P <.05, P <.05, P = .09, and P <.01, respectively). Patients with a history of recurrent priapism episodes >2 hours in duration had higher total, QoL, SF, and PW scores than those with "very minor" priapism recurrences (≤2 hours in duration; P <.01, P <.01, P <.05, and P <.001, respectively). Patients with "mild-to-moderate" to "severe" erectile dysfunction had higher total, QoL, SF, and PW scores than those with no or "mild" erectile dysfunction (P <.05, P = .14, P <.01, and P = .25, respectively).

Conclusion: The PIP questionnaire is a novel psychometric instrument that offers a means to quantify the adverse health impact of the patient's experience with priapism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A. Priapism Impact Profile (PIP) questionnaire. B. Descriptive rating of questionnaire items for importance and clarity.

References

    1. Kovac JR, Mak SK, Garcia MM, et al. A pathophysiology-based approach to the management of early priapism. Asian journal of andrology. 2013;15:20–26. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Morrison BF, Burnett AL. Stuttering priapism: insights into pathogenesis and management. Current urology reports. 2012;13:268–276. - PubMed
    1. Burnett AL. Surgical management of ischemic priapism. The journal of sexual medicine. 2012;9:114–120. - PubMed
    1. Burnett AL, Bivalacqua TJ. Priapism: new concepts in medical and surgical management. The Urologic clinics of North America. 2011;38:185–194. - PubMed
    1. Addis G, Spector R, Shaw E, et al. The physical, social and psychological impact of priapism on adult males with sickle cell disorder. Chronic illness. 2007;3:145–154. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources