Priapism Impact Profile Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation
- PMID: 25863831
- PMCID: PMC4480192
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.02.025
Priapism Impact Profile Questionnaire: Development and Initial Validation
Abstract
Objective: To create and evaluate a psychometric instrument that measures the impact of experiencing priapism from the patient perspective.
Methods: The research protocol consisted of several phases as follows: (1) generating items, (2) composing a patient questionnaire, (3) administering the questionnaire to patients with both active and remitted (≥1 year without priapism episodes) histories of priapism, (4) performing internal consistency and criterion-oriented validity analyses in correlation with clinical histories and erectile function assessment tools, and (5) ascertaining psychometric properties of the instrument.
Results: The final instrument comprised a 12-item Priapism Impact Profile (PIP) questionnaire, representing the following 3 domains adversely impacted by priapism: quality of life (QoL), sexual function (SF), and physical wellness (PW), with higher scores indicating inferior experience in respective domains. Internal consistency reliability coefficients for the total PIP score and the 3 domain scores were >0.75. Fifty-four patients (mean age, 31.7 ± 11.4 years) completed the questionnaire. Patients with active priapism (n = 42) had higher total, QoL, SF, and PW scores than those with priapism remission (n = 8; P <.05, P <.05, P = .09, and P <.01, respectively). Patients with a history of recurrent priapism episodes >2 hours in duration had higher total, QoL, SF, and PW scores than those with "very minor" priapism recurrences (≤2 hours in duration; P <.01, P <.01, P <.05, and P <.001, respectively). Patients with "mild-to-moderate" to "severe" erectile dysfunction had higher total, QoL, SF, and PW scores than those with no or "mild" erectile dysfunction (P <.05, P = .14, P <.01, and P = .25, respectively).
Conclusion: The PIP questionnaire is a novel psychometric instrument that offers a means to quantify the adverse health impact of the patient's experience with priapism.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Morrison BF, Burnett AL. Stuttering priapism: insights into pathogenesis and management. Current urology reports. 2012;13:268–276. - PubMed
-
- Burnett AL. Surgical management of ischemic priapism. The journal of sexual medicine. 2012;9:114–120. - PubMed
-
- Burnett AL, Bivalacqua TJ. Priapism: new concepts in medical and surgical management. The Urologic clinics of North America. 2011;38:185–194. - PubMed
-
- Addis G, Spector R, Shaw E, et al. The physical, social and psychological impact of priapism on adult males with sickle cell disorder. Chronic illness. 2007;3:145–154. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources