Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 25867111
- DOI: 10.7326/M14-2221
Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Background: Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus could lead to earlier identification and treatment of asymptomatic diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), potentially resulting in improved outcomes.
Purpose: To update the 2008 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on diabetes screening in adults.
Data sources: Cochrane databases and MEDLINE (2007 through October 2014) and relevant studies from previous Task Force reviews.
Study selection: Randomized, controlled trials; controlled, observational studies; and systematic reviews.
Data extraction: Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and checked by a second; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality.
Data synthesis: In 2 trials, screening for diabetes was associated with no 10-year mortality benefit versus no screening (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.25]). Sixteen trials consistently found that treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes. Most trials of treatment of IFG or IGT found no effects on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, although lifestyle modification was associated with decreased risk for both outcomes after 23 years in 1 trial. For screen-detected diabetes, 1 trial found no effect of an intensive multifactorial intervention on risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality versus standard control. In diabetes that was not specifically screen-detected, 9 systematic reviews found that intensive glucose control did not reduce risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and results for intensive blood pressure control were inconsistent.
Limitation: The review was restricted to English-language articles, and few studies were conducted in screen-detected populations.
Conclusion: Screening for diabetes did not improve mortality rates after 10 years of follow-up. More evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of treatments for screen-detected diabetes. Treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes.
Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Comment in
-
Screening for hyperglycemia: the gateway to diabetes prevention and management for all Americans.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 2;162(11):795-6. doi: 10.7326/M15-0798. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25867220 No abstract available.
-
Type 2 diabetes mellitus screening has no effect on mortality.Evid Based Med. 2015 Aug;20(4):136. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2015-110225. Epub 2015 Jun 26. Evid Based Med. 2015. PMID: 26116158 No abstract available.
-
Review: Type 2 diabetes screening does not reduce mortality but treating dysglycemia delays onset of diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):JC2. doi: 10.7326/ACPJC-2015-163-6-002. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26370029 No abstract available.
-
Screening for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):726. doi: 10.7326/L15-5153. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26524578 No abstract available.
-
Screening for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Ann Intern Med. 2015 Nov 3;163(9):726-7. doi: 10.7326/L15-5153-2. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 26524579 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical