Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May 1;69 Suppl 1(0 1):S8-15.
doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000000578.

Benefits of a routine opt-out HIV testing and linkage to care program for previously diagnosed patients in publicly funded emergency departments in Houston, TX

Affiliations

Benefits of a routine opt-out HIV testing and linkage to care program for previously diagnosed patients in publicly funded emergency departments in Houston, TX

Charlene A Flash et al. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. .

Abstract

Background: The Routine Universal Screening for HIV program provides opt-out HIV testing and linkage to care for emergency department (ED) patients in Harris Health System, Houston, TX. Seventy-five percent of patients testing positive in this program have been previously diagnosed. Whether linkage to care is increased among these patients is unknown.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of persons tested for HIV in the ED between 2008 and 2012 but had a previously documented positive HIV test ≥1 year prior. Outcomes were engagement in care (≥1 HIV outpatient visits in 6 months), retention in care (≥2 HIV outpatient visits in 12 months, at least 3 months apart), and virologic suppression (<200 copies/mL in 12 months) compared before and after the ED visit. Analysis was conducted using McNemar test and multivariate conditional logistic regression.

Results: A total of 202,767 HIV tests identified 2068 previously diagnosed patients. The mean age was 43 years with 65% male and 87% racial and ethnic minorities. Engagement in care increased from 41.3% previsit to 58.8% postvisit (P < 0.001). Retention in care increased from 32.6% previsit to 47.1% postvisit (P < 0.001). Virologic suppression increased from 22.8% previsit to 34.0% postvisit (P < 0.001). Analyses revealed that engagement in care after visit improved most among younger participants (ages 16-24 years), retention improved across all groups, and virologic suppression improved most among participants aged 25-34 years.

Conclusions: Routine opt-out HIV testing in an ED paired with standardized service linkage improves engagement, retention, and virologic suppression in previously diagnosed patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: No relevant conflicts of interest were declared by any of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outcomes among a cohort of patients previously diagnosed with HIV infection, before and after a RUSH-era ED visit (2009–2012; N= 2068), and before and after a pre-RUSH era ED visit (2004–2007; N= 672)

References

    1. Rayment M, Rae C, Ghooloo F, et al. Routine HIV testing in the emergency department: tough lessons in sustainability. HIV Med. 2013 Oct;14 (Suppl 3):6–9. - PubMed
    1. Brown J, Shesser R, Simon G, et al. Routine HIV screening in the emergency department using the new US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines: results from a high-prevalence area. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007 Dec 1;46(4):395–401. - PubMed
    1. Egan DJ, Cowan E, Fitzpatrick L, et al. Legislated human immunodeficiency virus testing in New York State Emergency Departments: reported experience from Emergency Department providers. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2014 Feb;28(2):91–97. - PubMed
    1. Knapp H, Hagedorn H, Anaya HD. HIV rapid testing in a Veterans Affairs hospital ED setting: a 5-year sustainability evaluation. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2014 Aug;32(8):878–883. - PubMed
    1. Jain S, Lowman ES, Kessler A, et al. Seroprevalence study using oral rapid HIV testing in a large urban emergency department. The Journal of emergency medicine. 2012 Nov;43(5):e269–275. - PubMed

Publication types