Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 25:15:14.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-015-0012-5.

Family visits in shared-housing arrangements for residents with dementia--a cross-sectional study on the impact on residents' quality of life

Johannes Gräske, Saskia Meyer, Andreas Worch, Karin Wolf-Ostermann

Family visits in shared-housing arrangements for residents with dementia--a cross-sectional study on the impact on residents' quality of life

Johannes Gräske et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Shared-housing arrangements (SHA) are a German type of small-scale living arrangements for people with dementia (PwD). The involvement of family members is one core domain of SHA. But it has not been investigated yet, what are factors associated with family visits and if family involvement within SHA contributes to better residents' quality of life (QoL).

Method: A cross-sectional study including all SHA in Berlin/Germany was performed. Main parameters of interest were residents' QoL (QUALIDEM) and frequencies of family visits within the SHA. Besides descriptive analyses we used logistic regression and ANCOVA to analyze the data.

Results: 58 SHA with 396 residents (78.4 years, 69.4% female) participated in the study. Older (OR: 1.034; 95% CI: 1.005; 1.064) and female residents (OR: 2.006; 95% CI: 1.018; 3.950) got more often visited by family members. An active participation of family members in SHA contributes on average to a better QoL in terms of social relationship and social isolation (all ANCOVA p < 0.005). A decreased QoL was found for people without family visits compared to those without family members.

Conclusions: The involvement of family members in SHA is common but on a similar level compared to other care arrangements. Staff should convince available family members to visit PwD, in order to improve residents QoL. However, the response rate in the present study was about 13%, which may limit the results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of family visits.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wimo A, Prince M. World Alzheimer Report 2010. Alzheimer’s Disease International: The Global Economic Impact of Dementia; 2010.
    1. Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F, Allgulander C, Alonso J, Beghi E, et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;21(10):718–79. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.08.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luppa M, Luck T, Weyerer S, König H-H, Brähler E, Riedel-Heller SG. Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review Age Ageing. 2010;39(1):31–8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp202. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moise P, Schwarzinger M, Um M. Dementia care in 9 OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing; 2004.
    1. Annerstedt L. Development and consequences of group living in Sweden: a new mode of care for the demented elderly. Soc Sci Med. 1993;37(12):1529–38. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(93)90187-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types