Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Sep-Oct;11(5):1071-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.12.011. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

Surgical management and outcomes of patients with marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Edward Chau  1 , Heekoung Youn  2 , Christine J Ren-Fielding  2 , George A Fielding  2 , Bradley F Schwack  2 , Marina S Kurian  2
Affiliations

Surgical management and outcomes of patients with marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Edward Chau et al. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Marginal ulcers (MUs) are potentially complex complications after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Although most resolve with medical management, some require surgical intervention. Many surgical options exist, but there is no standardized approach, and few reports of outcomes have been documented in the literature. The objective of this study was to determine the outcomes of surgical management of marginal ulcers.

Methods: Data from all patients who underwent surgical intervention between 2004 and 2012 for treatment of MU after previous Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were reviewed.

Results: Twelve patients with MUs underwent reoperation. Nine patients had associated gastrogastric fistulae (75%). The median time to reoperation was 43 months. Ten patients underwent subtotal gastrectomy, of which 9 had a revision of the gastrojejunal anastomosis and 1 did not. One underwent total gastrectomy with esophagojejunal anastomosis for ulcer after previous revisional partial gastrectomy, and 1 patient underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic truncal vagotomy for persistent ulcer-related bleeding in the early postoperative period. Three patients (25%) experienced postoperative complications associated with revisional surgery requiring reoperation. At median follow-up time of 35 months, 7 patients (58%) had chronic abdominal pain, and 4 patients (33%) had intermittent diarrhea. Three patients (25%) were lost to recent follow-up. None had recurrence of MU.

Conclusion: Patients can undergo one of several available surgical interventions, including laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with gastrojejunostomy revision. Though this appears to offer definitive treatment of MU, its benefits must be weighed against the increased risk of significant postoperative complications and chronic symptoms related to revisional surgery.

Keywords: Gastrogastric fistula; Marginal ulcer; Morbid obesity; Revision; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Subtotal gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms