Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e006648.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006648.

UK research spend in 2008 and 2012: comparing stroke, cancer, coronary heart disease and dementia

Affiliations

UK research spend in 2008 and 2012: comparing stroke, cancer, coronary heart disease and dementia

Ramon Luengo-Fernandez et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess UK governmental and charity research funding in 2012 for cancer, coronary heart disease (CHD), dementia and stroke, and to make comparisons with 2008 levels.

Design: Analysis of research expenditure.

Setting: United Kingdom.

Main outcome measures: We identified UK governmental agencies and charities providing health research funding to determine the 2012 levels of funding for cancer, CHD, dementia and stroke. Levels of research funding were compared to burden of disease measures, including prevalence, disability adjusted life years and economic burden.

Results: The combined research funding into cancer, CHD, dementia and stroke by governmental and charity organisations in 2012 was £856 million, of which £544 million (64%) was devoted to cancer, £166 million (19%) to CHD, £90 million (11%) to dementia and £56 million (7%) to stroke. For every £10 of health and social care costs attributable to each disease, cancer received £1.08 in research funding, CHD £0.65, stroke £0.19 and dementia £0.08. A considerable shift in the distribution of government research funding was observed between 2008 and 2012. In 2008, 66% of governmental research funding into the four conditions under study was devoted to cancer, 21% to CHD, 9% to dementia and 4% to stroke. In 2012, the proportions devoted to dementia and stroke had increased to 21% and 12%, respectively, with cancer accounting for 45% of total research spend.

Conclusions: Although there has been much progress by government to increase levels of research funding for dementia and stroke, these areas remain underfunded when compared with the burden of disease.

Keywords: Cancer; Cost-of-illness; Research funding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Economic burden of disease (CHD, coronary heart disease).

References

    1. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R et al. . Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2197–223. - PubMed
    1. Office for National Statistics. Mortality Statistics: Deaths Registered in England and Wales (Series DR) 2012. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=... (accessed 26 Mar 2014).
    1. General Register Office for Scotland. Vital Events Reference Tables 2012. http://www.gro-scotland.gov.uk/statistics/theme/vital-events/general/ref... (accessed 26 Mar 2014).
    1. Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency. Deaths by cause. http://www.nisra.gov.uk/demography/defaultasp14.htm (accessed 26 Mar 2014).
    1. Cooksey D. A review of UK health research funding. London: HMSO, 2006. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources