Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 13;5(4):e007299.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007299.

Can analyses of electronic patient records be independently and externally validated? Study 2--the effect of β-adrenoceptor blocker therapy on cancer survival: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Can analyses of electronic patient records be independently and externally validated? Study 2--the effect of β-adrenoceptor blocker therapy on cancer survival: a retrospective cohort study

David A Springate et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a fully independent, external validation of a research study based on one electronic health record database using a different database sampling from the same population.

Design: Retrospective cohort analysis of β-blocker therapy and all-cause mortality in patients with cancer.

Setting: Two UK national primary care databases (PCDs): the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Doctors' Independent Network (DIN).

Participants: CPRD data for 11,302 patients with cancer compared with published results from DIN for 3462 patients; study period January 1997 to December 2006.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: All-cause mortality: overall; by treatment subgroup (β-blockers only, β-blockers plus other blood pressure lowering medicines (BPLM), other BPLMs only); and by cancer site.

Results: Using CPRD, β-blocker use was not associated with mortality (HR=1.03, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.14, vs patients prescribed other BPLMs only), but DIN β-blocker users had significantly higher mortality (HR=1.18, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.33). However, these HRs were not statistically different (p=0.063), but did differ for patients on β-blockers alone (CPRD=0.94, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.07; DIN=1.37, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.61; p<0.001). Results for individual cancer sites differed by study, but only significantly for prostate and pancreas cancers. Results were robust under sensitivity analyses, but we could not be certain that mortality was identically defined in both databases.

Conclusions: We found a complex pattern of similarities and differences between databases. Overall treatment effect estimates were not statistically different, adding to a growing body of evidence that different UK PCDs produce comparable effect estimates. However, individually the two studies lead to different conclusions regarding the safety of β-blockers and some subgroup effects differed significantly. Single studies using even internally well-validated databases do not guarantee generalisable results, especially for subgroups, and confirmatory studies using at least one other independent data source are strongly recommended.

Keywords: ONCOLOGY; PRIMARY CARE; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HRs of survival for patients prescribed β-blocker therapy compared with patients prescribed other blood pressure lowering medicines.

References

    1. Reeves D, Springate DA, Ashcroft DM et al. . Can analyses of electronic patient records be independently and externally validated? The effect of statins on the mortality of patients with ischaemic heart disease: a cohort study with nested case-control analysis. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004952 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004952 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herrett E, Thomas SL, Schoonen WM et al. . Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2010;69:4–14. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03537.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan NF, Harrison SE, Rose PW. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. BJGP 2010;60:e128–36. 10.3399/bjgp10X483562 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jordan K, Porcheret M, Croft P. Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Fam Pract 2004;21:396–412. 10.1093/fampra/cmh409 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marston L, Carpenter JR, Walters KR et al. . Issues in multiple imputation of missing data for large general practice clinical databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2010;19:618–26. 10.1002/pds.1934 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources