Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May;71(5):549-67.
doi: 10.1007/s00228-015-1832-0. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide

Affiliations
Review

Narrow therapeutic index drugs: a clinical pharmacological consideration to flecainide

Juan Tamargo et al. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The therapeutic index (TI) is the range of doses at which a medication is effective without unacceptable adverse events. Drugs with a narrow TI (NTIDs) have a narrow window between their effective doses and those at which they produce adverse toxic effects. Generic drugs may be substituted for brand-name drugs provided that they meet the recommended bioequivalence (BE) limits. However, an appropriate range of BE for NTIDs is essential to define due to the potential for ineffectiveness or adverse events. Flecainide is an antiarrhythmic agent that has the potential to be considered an NTID. This review aims to evaluate the literature surrounding guidelines on generic substitution for NTIDs and to evaluate the evidence for flecainide to be considered an NTID.

Methods: A review of recommendations from various regulatory authorities regarding BE and NTIDs, and publications regarding the NTID characteristics of flecainide, was carried out.

Results: Regulatory authorities generally recommend reduced BE limits for NTIDs. Some, but not all, regulatory authorities specify flecainide as an NTID. The literature review demonstrated that flecainide displays NTID characteristics including a steep drug dose-response relationship for safety and efficacy, a need for therapeutic drug monitoring of pharmacokinetic (PK) or pharmacodynamics measures and intra-subject variability in its PK properties.

Conclusions: There is much evidence for flecainide to be considered an NTID based on both preclinical and clinical data. A clear understanding of the potential of proarrhythmic effects or lack of efficacy, careful patient selection and regular monitoring are essential for the safe and rational administration of flecainide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Plasma levels and side effects of flecainide acetate. a Flecainide plasma levels, per cent suppression of VPCs from pretreatment and per cent of plasma levels associated with cardiovascular side effects for flecainide plasma levels grouped in 250-ng/mL increments. b The probability of cardiovascular side effects compared with the change in ECG intervals from baseline (n = 40 for PR and n = 36 for QRS interval). Bundle branch block was excluded from analysis for comparison of change in QRS interval with cardiovascular side effects. c The probability of cardiovascular side effects occurring is compared with trough plasma flecainide levels by use of the Kaplan–Meier product limit estimator for all 43 patients (open circles). The efficacy/plasma concentration curve for 90 % suppression of VEDs is also shown for those 33 patients with available data for both efficacy and flecainide levels (closed symbols). Twenty-eight of the 33 patients achieved at least 90 % suppression of VEDs. RBBB right bundle branch block, CHF congestive heart failure, LBBB left bundle branch block, VPBs premature ventricular beats, VT ventricular trachycardia (taken from Salerno et al.) [57]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Concentration–response curves for flecainide proarrhythmia in dogs with acute myocardial ischaemia (AMI) or chronic myocardial infarction (CMI) 72 h after coronary artery ligation (taken from Nattel) [60]

References

    1. Katzung B, Masters S, Trevor A. Basic and clinical pharmacology. 12. New York: Companies, Inc.; 2012.
    1. Reiffel JA. Formulation substitution and other pharmacokinetic variability: underappreciated variables affecting antiarrhythmic efficacy and safety in clinical practice. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85:46D–52D. - PubMed
    1. Reiffel JA. Issues in the use of generic antiarrhythmic drugs. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2001;16:23–29. - PubMed
    1. Buehler G (2010) History of bioequivalence for critical dose drugs
    1. CFR—Code of Federal Register 21, section 320.33 (21CFR320.33) (2014) Criteria and evidence to assess actual or potential bioequivalence problems

Publication types