Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 8:10:14.
doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0005-x. eCollection 2015.

Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system

Affiliations

Grading operative findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy- a new scoring system

Michael Sugrue et al. World J Emerg Surg. .

Abstract

Introduction: Variation in outcomes from surgery is a major challenge and defining surgical findings may help set benchmarks, which currently do not exist in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study outlines a new surgical scoring system incorporating key operative findings.

Methods: English language studies (from January 1965 to July 2014) pertaining to severity scoring and predictors of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy were searched for in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases using the search terms 'Laparoscopic cholecystectomy or Lap chole' and/or 'Scoring Index or Grading system or Prediction of difficulty or Conversion to open' in various combinations. Cross-referencing from papers retrieved in the original search identified additional articles.

Results: Sixteen published papers report a gallbladder (GB) scoring system, but all relate to pre-operative clinical and imaging findings, rather than operative findings. The current scoring system, using operative findings incorporates the appearance of the GB, presence of GB distension, ease of access, potential biliary complications and time taken to identify cystic duct and artery. A score of <2 would imply mild difficulty, 2-4 moderate, 5-7 severe and 8-10 extreme.

Conclusion: This paper reports one of the first operative classifications of findings at laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It has the potential to allow benchmarks for international collaboration of operative and patient outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords: Cholecystectomy; Cholecystitis; Conversion to open; Laparoscopic; Operative severity scoring system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of various intraoperative findings, with their respective scores: a. Normal gallbladder with no adhesions: 0 points. b. Adhesions covering < 50% of gallbladder: 1 point. c. Adhesions completely burying gallbladder: 3 points. d. Distended gallbladder, with inability to grasp with atraumatic laparoscopic forceps: 1 point. e. Large (>1 cm) stone impacted in Hartmann’s pouch: 1 point.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intraoperative image demonstrating < 50% of gallbladder covered by adhesions (1 point).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Intraoperative image demonstrating gallbladder completely buried in adhesions (3 points).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Intraoperative image demonstrating a distended gallbladder (1 point), with < 50% of its surface area covered by adhesions (1 point).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Intraoperative image demonstrating severe sepsis/complications, with free bile (1 point, arrow) outside a distended (I point) gallbladder, covered by adhesions (3 points).

References

    1. Murphy JB. The diagnosis of gallstones. Am Med News 1903:825–833.
    1. Litynski GS. Erich Muhe and the rejection of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (1985): a surgeon ahead of his time. JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons/Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. 1998;2:341–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gutt CN, Encke J, Koninger J, Harnoss JC, Weigand K, Kipfmuller K, et al. Acute cholecystitis: early versus delayed cholecystectomy, a multicenter randomized trial (ACDC study, NCT00447304) Ann Surg. 2013;258:385–93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a1599b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Pitt HA, Gomi H, Yoshida M, et al. TG13: Updated Tokyo Guidelines for the management of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0566-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Committee AT, Adler DG, Conway JD, Farraye FA, Kantsevoy SV, Kaul V, et al. Biliary and pancreatic stone extraction devices. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:603–9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.06.015. - DOI - PubMed