Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience
- PMID: 25870812
- PMCID: PMC4384246
- DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2014.12.05
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: 12-year single center experience
Abstract
Background: This study reports the single center experience on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR), performed through a right anterior minithoracotomy or ministernotomy (MS).
Methods: Eight hundred and fifty-three patients, who underwent MIAVR from 2002 to 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox multivariable proportional hazards regression model was developed to identify independent predictors of follow-up mortality.
Results: Median age was 73.8, and 405 (47.5%) of patients were female. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.9%. Four hundred and forty-three (51.9%) and 368 (43.1%) patients received biological and sutureless prostheses, respectively. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were 108 and 75 minutes, respectively. Nineteen (2.2%) cases required conversion to full median sternotomy. Thirty-seven (4.3%) patients required re-exploration for bleeding. Perioperative stroke occurred in 15 (1.8%) patients, while transient ischemic attack occurred postoperative in 11 (1.3%). New onset atrial fibrillation was reported for 243 (28.5%) patients. After a median follow-up of 29.1 months (2,676.0 patient-years), survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 96%±1% and 80%±3%, respectively. Cox multivariable analysis showed that advanced age, history of cardiac arrhythmia, preoperative chronic renal failure, MS approach, prolonged mechanical ventilation and hospital stay as well as wound revision were associated with higher mortality.
Conclusions: MIAVR via both approaches is safe and feasible with excellent outcomes, and is associated with low conversion rate and low perioperative morbidity. Long term survival is at least comparable to that reported for conventional sternotomy AVR.
Keywords: Aortic valve replacement (AVR); heart valve prosthesis; minimally invasive heart surgery; outcomes.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Right anterior minithoracotomy for aortic valve replacement: 10-year experience of a single center.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Sep;150(3):548-56.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.045. Epub 2015 Jun 29. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 26215359
-
Full sternotomy versus right anterior minithoracotomy for isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: a propensity-matched study †.Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):732-41; discussion 741. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv030. Epub 2015 Mar 10. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25757476
-
Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.102. Epub 2013 Jul 16. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013. PMID: 23866805
-
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: Cost-Benefit Analysis of Ministernotomy Versus Minithoracotomy Approach.J Heart Valve Dis. 2015 Sep;24(5):531-9. J Heart Valve Dis. 2015. PMID: 26897831 Review.
-
Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions.Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;4(1):26-32. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2015.01.01. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25694973 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Does minimal invasive cardiac surgery reduce the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation?Ann Card Anaesth. 2020 Jan-Mar;23(1):7-13. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_158_18. Ann Card Anaesth. 2020. PMID: 31929240 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Right ventricular mechanics and contractility after aortic valve replacement surgery: a randomised study comparing minimally invasive versus conventional approach.Open Heart. 2018 Jul 23;5(2):e000842. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000842. eCollection 2018. Open Heart. 2018. PMID: 30057770 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally Invasive and Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacements Lead to Comparable Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Higher-Risk Patients: A Propensity-Matched Comparison.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Mar 31;11(4):112. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040112. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38667730 Free PMC article.
-
Right Anterior Minithoracotomy Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement.Innovations (Phila). 2024 Sep-Oct;19(5):494-508. doi: 10.1177/15569845241276876. Epub 2024 Sep 21. Innovations (Phila). 2024. PMID: 39305215 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Minimal invasive aortic valve replacement: associations of radiological assessments with procedure complexity.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Oct 12;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0997-5. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019. PMID: 31606041 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, et al. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 2006;368:1005-11. - PubMed
-
- Iung B, Baron G, Butchart EG, et al. A prospective survey of patients with valvular heart disease in Europe: The Euro Heart Survey on Valvular Heart Disease. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1231-43. - PubMed
-
- Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:455-62. - PubMed
-
- Johnston WF, Ailawadi G. Surgical management of minimally invasive aortic valve operations. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2012;16:41-51. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources