Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Oct;80(4):678-86.
doi: 10.1111/bcp.12655. Epub 2015 May 28.

The renal protective effect of angiotensin receptor blockers depends on intra-individual response variation in multiple risk markers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The renal protective effect of angiotensin receptor blockers depends on intra-individual response variation in multiple risk markers

Bauke Schievink et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Aims: Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are renoprotective and targeted to blood pressure. However, ARBs have multiple other (off-target) effects which may affect renal outcome. It is unknown whether on-target and off-target effects are congruent within individuals. If not, this variation in short term effects may have important implications for the prediction of individual long term renal outcomes. Our aim was to assess intra-individual variability in multiple parameters in response to ARBs in type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Changes in systolic blood pressure (SBP), albuminuria, potassium, haemoglobin, cholesterol and uric acid after 6 months of losartan treatment were assessed in the RENAAL database. Improvement in predictive performance of renal outcomes (ESRD or doubling serum creatinine) for each individual using ARB-induced changes in all risk markers was assessed by the relative integrative discrimination index (RIDI).

Results: SBP response showed high variability (mean -5.7 mmHg, 5(th) to 95(th) percentile -36.5 to +24.0 mmHg) between individuals. Changes in off-target parameters also showed high variability between individuals. No congruency was observed between responses to losartan in multiple parameters within individuals. Using individual responses in all risk markers significantly improved renal risk prediction (RIDI 30.4%, P < 0.01) compared with using only SBP changes. Results were successfully replicated in two independent trials with irbesartan, IDNT and IRMA-2.

Conclusions: In this post hoc analysis we showed that ARBs have multiple off-target effects which vary between and within individuals. Combining all ARB-induced responses beyond SBP provides a more accurate prediction of who will benefit from ARB therapy. Prospective trials are required to validate these findings.

Keywords: angiotensin receptor blockers; personalized medicine; renal disease; type 2 diabetes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Discordance between ARB-induced responses in multiple parameters within individual patients. A) Overview of the variation in risk marker response in the total population (inter-individual variability). The thick short line in the boxplots indicates the median and the dot the mean change. Box and whiskers represent interquartile range and 5th to 95th percentile, respectively. B) Radar plot showing the overall response (bold black outer line with numbers indicating mean values) for each risk marker in RENAAL. Dashed grey lines indicate 95% confidence interval. C) Radar plots showing discordance of the different responses within individuals. For example, the red lines and numbers indicate the risk marker responses in blood pressure responders. The black outer line represents the response in the overall population as explained in B. The overlap between each of the responder populations (colored line) vs. the overall population (black line) indicates that responses within an individual are discordant. N underneath radar plots indicate number of responders in each figure. SBP, systolic blood pressure; ACR, albuminuria; K, potassium; Hb, haemoglobin; chol, cholesterol; UA, uric acid

References

    1. Volpe M, Cosentino F, Tocci G, Palano F, Paneni F. Antihypertensive therapy in diabetes: The legacy effect and RAAS blockade. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2011;13:318–24. - PubMed
    1. Steckelings UM, Rompe F, Kaschina E, Unger T. The evolving story of the RAAS in hypertension, diabetes and CV disease ? moving from macrovascular to microvascular targets. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009;23:693–703. - PubMed
    1. Heerspink HJ, de Zeeuw D. The kidney in type II diabetes therapy. Rev Diabet Stud. 2011;8:392–402. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smink PA, Bakker SJL, Laverman GD, Berl T, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Lambers Heerspink HJ. An initial reduction in serum uric acid during angiotensin receptor blocker treatment is associated with cardiovascular protection: A post-hoc analysis of the RENAAL and IDNT trials. J Hypertens. 2012;30:1022–8. - PubMed
    1. Miao Y, Dobre D, Lambers Heerspink HJ, Brenner BM, Cooper ME, Parving H, Shahinfar S, Grobbee D, Zeeuw D. Increased serum potassium affects renal outcomes: A post hoc analysis of the reduction of endpoints in NIDDM with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan (RENAAL) trial. Diabetologia. 2011;54:44–50. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms