Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2015 Jun;10(6):345-51.
doi: 10.1002/jhm.2331. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Association between exposure to nonactionable physiologic monitor alarms and response time in a children's hospital

Affiliations
Observational Study

Association between exposure to nonactionable physiologic monitor alarms and response time in a children's hospital

Christopher P Bonafide et al. J Hosp Med. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

Background: Alarm fatigue is reported to be a major threat to patient safety, yet little empirical data support its existence in the hospital.

Objective: To determine if nurses exposed to high rates of nonactionable physiologic monitor alarms respond more slowly to subsequent alarms that could represent life-threatening conditions.

Design: Observational study using video.

Setting: Freestanding children's hospital.

Patients: Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients requiring inotropic support and/or mechanical ventilation, and medical ward patients.

Intervention: None.

Measurements: Actionable alarms were defined as correctly identifying physiologic status and warranting clinical intervention or consultation. We measured response time to alarms occurring while there were no clinicians in the patient's room. We evaluated the association between the number of nonactionable alarms the patient had in the preceding 120 minutes (categorized as 0-29, 30-79, or 80+ alarms) and response time to subsequent alarms in the same patient using a log-rank test that accounts for within-nurse clustering.

Results: We observed 36 nurses for 210 hours with 5070 alarms; 87.1% of PICU and 99.0% of ward clinical alarms were nonactionable. Kaplan-Meier plots showed incremental increases in response time as the number of nonactionable alarms in the preceding 120 minutes increased (log-rank test stratified by nurse P < 0.001 in PICU, P = 0.009 in the ward).

Conclusions: Most alarms were nonactionable, and response time increased as nonactionable alarm exposure increased. Alarm fatigue could explain these findings. Future studies should evaluate the simultaneous influence of workload and other factors that can impact response time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Alarm classification scheme.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of alarms used as exposures and outcomes in evaluating the association between non-actionable alarm exposure and response time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier plots of observed response times for PICU and ward.

Comment in

References

    1. Lawless ST. Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1994;22(6):981–5. - PubMed
    1. Tsien CL, Fackler JC. Poor prognosis for existing monitors in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care Med. 1997;25(4):614–619. - PubMed
    1. Biot L, Carry PY, Perdrix JP, Eberhard A, Baconnier P. [Clinical evaluation of alarm efficiency in intensive care]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2000;19:459–66. - PubMed
    1. Borowski M, Siebig S, Wrede C, Imhoff M. Reducing false alarms of intensive care online- monitoring systems: an evaluation of two signal extraction algorithms. Comput Math Methods Med. 2011;pii:143480. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chambrin MC, Ravaux P, Calvelo-Aros D, Jaborska A, Chopin C, Boniface B. Multicentric study of monitoring alarms in the adult intensive care unit (ICU): a descriptive analysis. Intensive Care Med. 1999;25:1360–1366. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms