Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015:2015:174186.
doi: 10.1155/2015/174186. Epub 2015 Mar 22.

Type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis: from molecular pathways to bone phenotype

Affiliations
Review

Type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis: from molecular pathways to bone phenotype

Tayyab S Khan et al. J Osteoporos. 2015.

Abstract

The link between type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) and osteoporosis, identified decades ago, has gained attention in recent years. While a number of cellular mechanisms have been postulated to mediate this association, it is now established that defects in osteoblast differentiation and activity are the main culprits underlying bone fragility in DM1. Other contributing factors include an accumulation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and the development of diabetes complications (such as neuropathy and hypoglycemia), which cause further decline in bone mineral density (BMD), worsening geometric properties within bone, and increased fall risk. As a result, patients with DM1 have a 6.9-fold increased incidence of hip fracture compared to controls. Despite this increased fracture risk, bone fragility remains an underappreciated complication of DM1 and is not addressed in most diabetes guidelines. There is also a lack of data regarding the efficacy of therapeutic strategies to treat osteoporosis in this patient population. Together, our current understanding of bone fragility in DM1 calls for an update of diabetes guidelines, better screening tools, and further research into the use of therapeutic strategies in this patient population.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Reginster J. Y., Burlet N. Osteoporosis: a still increasing prevalence. Bone. 2006;38(2, supplement 1):S4–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Melton L. J., III, Chrischilles E. A., Cooper C., Lane A. W., Riggs B. L. Perspective: how many women have osteoporosis? Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 1992;7(9):1005–1010. - PubMed
    1. Hsu Y.-H., Xu X., Terwedow H. A., et al. Large-scale genome-wide linkage analysis for loci linked to BMD at different skeletal sites in extreme selected sibships. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2007;22(2):184–194. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yousefzadeh G., Larijani B., Mohammadirad A., et al. Determination of oxidative stress status and concentration of TGF-β1 in the blood and saliva of osteoporotic subjects. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2006;1091:142–150. doi: 10.1196/annals.1378.062. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Warming L., Hassager C., Christiansen C. Changes in bone mineral density with age in men and women: a longitudinal study. Osteoporosis International. 2002;13(2):105–112. doi: 10.1007/s001980200001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources