Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Apr 14;12(4):4116-27.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph120404116.

Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Functioning and disability analysis of patients with traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury by using the world health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0

Chia-Ying Kuo et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare traumatic brain injuries (TBI) and spinal cord injuries (SCI) patients' function and disability by using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0); and to clarify the factors that contribute to disability. We analyzed data available between September 2012 and August 2013 from Taiwan's national disability registry which is based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework. Of the 2664 cases selected for the study, 1316 pertained to TBI and 1348 to SCI. A larger percentage of patients with TBI compared with those with SCI exhibited poor cognition, self-care, relationships, life activities, and participation in society (all p < 0.001). Age, sex, injury type, socioeconomic status, place of residence, and severity of impairment were determined as factors that independently contribute to disability (all p < 0.05). The WHODAS 2.0 is a generic assessment instrument which is appropriate for assessing the complex and multifaceted disability associated with TBI and SCI. Further studies are needed to validate the WHODAS 2.0 for TBI and SCI from a multidisciplinary perspective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Sample selection flow chart.

References

    1. World Health Organization . Health Statistics and Health Information Systems. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2011.
    1. Ministry of Health and Welfare . Vital Statistics in Taiwan. Ministry of Health and Welfare; Taipei, Taiwan: 2010.
    1. Dijkers M.P. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury: A review of research approaches and findings. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004;4:S21–S35. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.119. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Toft A.M., Moller H., Laursen B. The years after an injury: Long-term consequences of injury on self-rated health. J. Trauma. 2010;1:26–30. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d3cbf2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Diaz A.P., Schwarzbold M.L., Thais M.E., Hohl A., Bertotti M.M., Schmoeller R., Nunes J.C., Prediger R., Linhares M.N., Guarnieri R., et al. Psychiatric disorders and health-related quality of life after severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective study. J. Neurotrauma. 2012;6:1029–1037. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.2089. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources