Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;100(4):744-7.
doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00106.1.

Benign gastric schwannoma: how long should we follow up to monitor the recurrence? A case report and comprehensive review of literature of 137 cases

Affiliations
Review

Benign gastric schwannoma: how long should we follow up to monitor the recurrence? A case report and comprehensive review of literature of 137 cases

Xiafei Hong et al. Int Surg. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

We aimed to explore the optimal follow-up time for benign gastric Schwannoma. Benign gastric Schwannoma is an uncommon type of gastric neoplasias. Most of the studies are case reports and case series. Although it is generally considered to be benign, the optimal follow-up time and the chance of recurrence have not yet been investigated fully. We presented a case of benign gastric Schwannoma and systematically reviewed published case series with follow-up data. Eight studies were included, totaling 137 patients (44 male and 93 female) with the median follow-up time ranging from 22-132 months across different studies. No recurrence had been recorded during the follow-up period. Benign gastric Schwannoma rarely recurs after complete surgical resection. Long-term survival will be expected in most patients.

Keywords: Follow-up; Schwannoma; Stomach; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Abdominal CT scan showing a 1.5-cm mass in the right side of the stomach, arterial phase; white arrow showing pointing at the mass. (B) Abdominal CT scan with stomach reconstruction showing a 1.5-cm mass in the greater curvatures of the stomach, white arrow showing pointing at the mass. (C) Surgical specimen showing a mass with surrounding noncancerous tissue. (D) Pathologic evaluation showing spindle cells in hematoxylin and eosin stain.

References

    1. Miettinen M, Majidi M, Lasota J. Pathology and diagnostic criteria of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): a review. Eur J Cancer. 2002;38:S39–S51. - PubMed
    1. Melvin W, Wilkinson M. Gastric Schwannoma. Clinical and pathologic considerations. Am Surg. 1993;59(5):293–296. - PubMed
    1. Voltaggio L, Murray R, Lasota J, Miettinen M. Gastric Schwannoma: a clinicopathologic study of 51 cases and critical review of the literature. Hum Pathol. 2012;43(5):650–659. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi JW, Choi D, Kim KM, Sohn TS, Lee JH, Kim HJ, et al. Small submucosal tumors of the stomach: differentiation of gastric Schwannoma from gastrointestinal stromal tumor with CT. Kor J Radiol. 2012;13(4):425–433. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miettinen M, Virolainen M. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors-value of CD34 antigen in their identification and separation from true leiomyomas and Schwannomas. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995;19(2):207–216. - PubMed

Substances