Stimulus characteristics affect assessment of pupil defects in amblyopia
- PMID: 25875680
- DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000576
Stimulus characteristics affect assessment of pupil defects in amblyopia
Abstract
Purpose: Amblyopes do not reliably show relative afferent pupillary defects with full-field stimulation, but amblyopia has cortical involvement; hence, stimuli that engage cortex may be able to reveal pupil defects in amblyopes.
Methods: Pupillary responses were acquired with a binocular infrared pupillometer (RAPDx, Konan Medical USA, Irvine, CA) from 15 amblyopic subjects (anisometropic and small-angle strabismic) and 10 age-matched control subjects. Stimuli were a full-field white flash (330 cd/m) or a small (4 degrees) annulus at one of three contrast levels (0.3, 0.6, and 1.8) on a dim background (6.2 cd/m). Stimulus duration was 100 milliseconds, and the interstimulus duration was 2000 milliseconds.
Results: In all four stimulus conditions, the difference in percent contraction amplitude for right versus left eye stimulation was more variable across amblyopes than across control subjects. Amblyopic eyes did not show a specific deficit for the full-field flash. However, the mid-contrast (0.6) annulus stimulus revealed a deficit in the amblyopic eye, whereas the size of the deficit did not correlate with the type or depth of the amblyopia.
Conclusions: Targets of appropriate pattern, brightness, and contrast that select for cortical contributions to the pupil response may be useful for eliciting pupil defects in amblyopic patients. Pupil analysis in this population could prove useful for diagnostic or prognostic value, for example, to determine which amblyopes will respond best to treatment.
Similar articles
-
Pupillary function in human amblyopia.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994 Apr;14(2):139-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1994.tb00102.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1994. PMID: 8022596
-
Automated pupil perimetry in amblyopia: generalized depression in the involved eye.Ophthalmology. 1997 Dec;104(12):2161-7. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(97)30046-3. Ophthalmology. 1997. PMID: 9400779
-
Evaluation of visual function and retinal structure in adult amblyopes.Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Mar;92(3):375-83. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000492. Optom Vis Sci. 2015. PMID: 25551686
-
Evaluation of Pupillary Light Reflex in Amblyopic Eyes Using Dynamic Pupillometry.Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 31;49(6):310-314. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2019.32748. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019. PMID: 31893585 Free PMC article.
-
Psychophysics of suppression.Eye (Lond). 1996;10 ( Pt 2):270-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.1996.57. Eye (Lond). 1996. PMID: 8776459 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect Using RAPDx Device in Patients with Optic Nerve Disease.Neuroophthalmology. 2016 Apr 14;40(3):120-124. doi: 10.3109/01658107.2016.1169550. eCollection 2016 Jun. Neuroophthalmology. 2016. PMID: 27928395 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Age and Sex on Values Obtained by RAPDx® Pupillometer, and Determined the Standard Values for Detecting Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Apr 28;5(2):18. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.2.18. eCollection 2016 Apr. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 27152248 Free PMC article.
-
Static and Dynamic Pupil Characteristics in Myopic Anisometropic Amblyopia.Beyoglu Eye J. 2020 Jul 29;5(2):86-92. doi: 10.14744/bej.2020.08760. eCollection 2020. Beyoglu Eye J. 2020. PMID: 35098069 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of refractive error on pupillary dynamics in the normal and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) populations.J Optom. 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Mar 3. J Optom. 2018. PMID: 28262507 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous