Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;86(4):1272-1281.
doi: 10.1111/cdev.12370. Epub 2015 Apr 15.

Spontaneous Self-Distancing and Adaptive Self-Reflection Across Adolescence

Affiliations

Spontaneous Self-Distancing and Adaptive Self-Reflection Across Adolescence

Rachel E White et al. Child Dev. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Experiments performed primarily with adults show that self-distancing facilitates adaptive self-reflection. However, no research has investigated whether adolescents spontaneously engage in this process or whether doing so is linked to adaptive outcomes. In this study, 226 African American adolescents, aged 11-20, reflected on an anger-related interpersonal experience. As expected, spontaneous self-distancing during reflection predicted lower levels of emotional reactivity by leading adolescents to reconstrue (rather than recount) their experience and blame their partner less. Moreover, the inverse relation between self-distancing and emotional reactivity strengthened with age. These findings highlight the role that self-distancing plays in fostering adaptive self-reflection in adolescence, and begin to elucidate the role that development plays in enhancing the benefits of engaging in this process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Thought content and blame mediate the relation between spontaneous self-distancing and emotional reactivity (n = 225). Analyses controlled for memory age and accessibility. Values represent unstandardized regression coefficients. **p < .01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Conditional effect of spontaneous self-distancing on emotional reactivity as a function of age (n = 221). Dotted lines depict 95% confidence intervals. Dashed line marks the age at which the conditional effect reaches significance (α = .05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ayduk O, Kross E. From a distance: Implications of spontaneous self-distancing for adaptive self-reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;98:809–829. doi: 10.1037/a0019205. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Campos JJ, Frankel CB, Camras L. On the nature of emotion regulation. Child Development. 2004;75:377–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00681.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson SM, Zelazo PD. Symbolic thought. In: Haith MM, Benson JB, editors. Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development. Boston MA: Elsevier/Academic Press; 2008. pp. 288–297.
    1. Casey BJ, Jones RM, Levita L, Libby V, Pattwell SS, Ruberry EJ, Somerville LH. The storm and stress of adolescence: Insights from human imaging and mouse genetics. Developmental Psychobiology. 2010;52:225–235. doi: 10.1002/dev.20447. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cocking RR, Renninger KA. The development and meaning of psychological distance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1993.