Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015;8(1):26-40.
doi: 10.2174/1874473708666150416110515.

Executive Functioning in Alcohol Use Studies: A Brief Review of Findings and Challenges in Assessment

Affiliations
Review

Executive Functioning in Alcohol Use Studies: A Brief Review of Findings and Challenges in Assessment

Anne M Day et al. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2015.

Abstract

There is a wealth of research about the links between executive functioning (EF) and alcohol use. However, difficulty may arise in interpreting findings because of the variability between studies regarding the specific components of EF measured, as well as the variability of tasks used to examine each EF construct. The current article considers each of these problems within the context of a literature review that focuses on two topics: (1) the efficacy of EF in predicting alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences, and (2) the effect of acute alcohol intoxication on EF task performance. An additional goal was to identify and describe commonly used EF measures with the intention of providing alcohol researchers information on the assessment of different EF domains. Our findings indicate that there is strong evidence supporting a relation between EF difficulties (particularly response inhibition and information updating) and alcohol use, with additional evidence of a significant interaction between EF and implicit associations on alcohol use. In contrast, research supporting a link between set shifting abilities and later alcohol use is scarce. Additionally, this review found evidence of alcohol acutely affecting many EF processes (particularly response inhibition). Overall, there is a need to replicate these findings with commonly used EF tasks (versus developing numerous tasks within individual laboratories) to better advance our understanding of the relation between EF and alcohol use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D. Neuropsychological Assessment. 5. New York: Oxford; 2012.
    1. Najam N, Moss HB, Kirisci L, Tarter RE. Executive cognitive functioning predicts drug use in youth. J Indian Acad App Psychol. 1997;23(1–2):3–12.
    1. Suchy Y. Executive functioning: Overview, assessment, and research issues for non-neuropsychologists. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37(2):106–16. - PubMed
    1. Bates ME. Utility of component-process approaches for understanding complex alcohol-related behavior within an executive functioning framework: Comment on Giancola (2000) Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;8(4):598–600. - PubMed
    1. Giancola PR. Executive functioning and alcohol-related aggression: Reply to Weingartner (2000), Bates (2000), Lyvers (2000), Cherek (2000), and Berman (2000) Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2000;8(4):612–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms