Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2015 Apr;29(4):331-40.
doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0241-3.

Efficacy of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules (Aptensio XR™) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Efficacy of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules (Aptensio XR™) in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Study

Sharon B Wigal et al. CNS Drugs. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Psychostimulants remain first-line treatment options for the management of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). A multilayer extended-release bead methylphenidate capsule (provisional name Aptensio XR™, MPH-MLR) with unique release properties is being investigated for the treatment of ADHD.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy (primary) and safety and tolerability (secondary) of MPH-MLR compared with placebo in children and adolescents aged 6-18 years with ADHD.

Methods: This study was a parallel, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, forced-dose, phase III study in which patients were randomized to placebo or MPH-MLR 10, 15, 20, or 40 mg given once daily. There were four study phases: (1) 4-week screening/baseline; (2) 1-week, double-blind treatment (DBP); (3) 11-week, open-label, dose-optimization period; and (4) 30-day follow-up call. During the open-label dose-optimization period all patients started with MPH-MLR 10 mg, unless the investigator deemed it necessary to begin at a higher dose, and were titrated to an optimized dose (10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 mg; all given once daily) based on response and adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to end of DBP in ADHD Rating Scale, 4th Edition (ADHD-RS-IV) total score. Secondary endpoints included changes in ADHD-RS-IV subscales and Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale (CGI-I) at the end of the DBP. The primary analysis was an analysis of covariance including terms for treatment, site, and baseline ADHD-RS-IV total score.

Results: A total of 221 patients completed the DBP. The primary endpoint had a statistically significant difference among treatments (p = 0.0046) and sites (p = 0.0018), and baseline covariate made a significant contribution (p < 0.0001). As the MPH-MLR dose increased, the ADHD-RS-IV total score improved; the 20 and 40 mg doses were statistically different (p = 0.0145 and p = 0.0011, respectively) from placebo. Females responded differently than did males (p = 0.0238); there was a significant difference among treatments for males but not for females, partly because only one-third of subjects were female and partly because some females who received placebo had considerable improvement during the DBP. Similarly, the ADHD-RS-IV subscales and CGI-I scores at the end of the DBP also showed more improvement as the dose of MPH-MLR increased. During the open-label phase, ADHD-RS-IV total scores improved (mean change from baseline -22.5) and correlated as the dose of MPH-MLR increased; CGI-I scores also improved. No unexpected AEs were noted.

Conclusions: Dose-related improvements in ADHD-RS-IV scores that exceeded those of placebo were observed in patients treated with MPH-MLR. No new safety signals were noted.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01239030.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient disposition
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean decrease in ADHD-RS-IV total score (a); hyperactivity subscale score (b); and inattention subscale score (c) from baseline (day 0) to the end of the double-blind phase (day 7; efficacy population; n = 221). ADHD-RS-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 4th Edition, MPH-MLR methylphenidate multilayer extended-release capsules. *p = 0.0145 vs. placebo; **p = 0.0011 vs. placebo; p = 0.0840 vs. placebo; †† p = 0.0061 vs. placebo; p = 0.0118 vs. placebo; ‡‡ p = 0.0026 vs. placebo
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean CGI-I scores at end of the double-blind phase (day 7: efficacy population; n = 221). CGI-I Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale, MPH-MLR methylphenidate multilayer extended-release capsules, SD standard deviation. *p = 0.0311 vs. placebo; **p = 0.0072 vs. placebo
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Arithmetic mean ADHD-RS-IV total scores (lower numbers indicate improvement) from 1 week following the beginning of open-label dose optimization (visit 4) to the end of the open-label phase (visit 8) (efficacy population; n = 221). ADHD-RS-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 4th Edition
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Arithmetic mean CGI-I scores from 1 week following the beginning of open-label dose optimization (visit 4) to the end of the open-label phase (visit 8) (efficacy population; n = 221). CGI-I Clinical Global Impression-Improvement Scale
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean ADHD-RS-IV total score and mean MPH-MLR dose from 1 week following the beginning of open-label dose optimization (visit 4) to the end of the open-label phase (visit 8) (patients completing open-label phase, n = 200). ADHD-RS-IV Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale, 4th Edition, MPH-MLR methylphenidate multilayer extended-release capsules

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/adhd.htm. Accessed 17 June 2014.
    1. Wolraich M, Brown L, Brown RT, DuPaul G, Earls M, Feldman HM, et al. ADHD: clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):1007–1022. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2654. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Markowitz JS, Straughn AB, Patrick KS. Advances in the pharmacotherapy of attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder: focus on methylphenidate formulations. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23(10):1281–1299. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.12.1281.32697. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quillivant XR™ (methylphenidate hydrochloride) product information. New York: NextWave Pharmaceuticals (2013). http://www.quillivantxr.com. Accessed 24 July 2013.
    1. Wigal SB, Wigal TL, Kollins SH. Advances in methylphenidate drug delivery systems for ADHD therapy. Adv ADHD. 2006;1:4–7.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data