Use of a vegetable model as a training tool for PCNL puncture
- PMID: 25878423
- PMCID: PMC4397558
- DOI: 10.4103/0970-1591.152922
Use of a vegetable model as a training tool for PCNL puncture
Abstract
Introduction: Training residents to perform a PCNL puncture is hampered by the non-availability of a good inanimate model that can be used for demonstration and practice. The ethics of surgical training during actual surgeries is being questioned and the role of simulation is increasingly important. Virtual reality trainers, however, are prohibitively expensive and the use of animal models is fraught with regulatory and ethical concerns. We have devised a model that can be used to teach the concept of depth perception during a PCNL puncture.
Methods: A bottle gourd was used to mimic the posterior abdominal wall. Cotton pledgets dipped in intravenous contrast were fitted into 4 mm holes made at staggered levels in the bottle gourd which was strapped onto the operating table with the cotton pledgets facing away from the surgeon. Surgeons with varying degrees of experience made fluoroscopy-guided punctures onto the cotton pledgets. We recorded the time taken for puncture in seconds and the distance of the needle exit site from the center of the cotton ball. Speed was measured by recording the fluoroscopy time in seconds on the C-arm. Accuracy was documented by using a Vernier caliper to measure the distance from the edge of the target to the actual puncture. One second of fluoroscopy time and 0.1 mm distance were each given one point. The total points accumulated over a set of 10 punctures was added to give a total score. Longer fluoroscopy times and inaccurate punctures resulted in higher scores.
Results: A surgeon with more than 1000 PCNLs to his credit had a score of 99. The average score of five residents was 555.
Conclusion: The bottle gourd model provides an ethically acceptable, inexpensive, easy to replicate model that can be used to train residents in the PCNL puncture.
Keywords: Bottle gourd; PCNL; puncture.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures






Similar articles
-
The Locator: novel percutaneous nephrolithotomy apparatus to aid collecting system puncture--a preliminary report.J Endourol. 2011 May;25(5):747-50. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0494. Epub 2011 Apr 10. J Endourol. 2011. PMID: 21476877
-
A Simple, Non - Biological Model for Percutaneous Renal Access Training.Urol J. 2018 Mar 18;15(2):1-5. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.3805. Urol J. 2018. PMID: 29250765
-
Validation of a Novel Cost Effective Easy to Produce and Durable In Vitro Model for Kidney-Puncture and Percutaneous Nephrolitholapaxy-Simulation.J Endourol. 2018 Sep 12;32(9):871-876. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0834. Epub 2018 May 30. J Endourol. 2018. PMID: 29597836
-
Training the resident in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.Arab J Urol. 2014 Mar;12(1):49-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Sep 16. Arab J Urol. 2014. PMID: 26019923 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Techniques for percutaneous access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.].Arch Esp Urol. 2017 Jan;70(1):155-172. Arch Esp Urol. 2017. PMID: 28221151 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Tissue engineering and stem cell research in Urology: Is the moment yet to come?Indian J Urol. 2015 Apr-Jun;31(2):87-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.154293. Indian J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25878405 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Stepwise case selection using Guy's stone score reduces complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy training.Indian J Urol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):41-47. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.195757. Indian J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28197029 Free PMC article.
-
A new era of Asian urology: a SWOT analysis.Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Nov;13(11):685-689. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.153. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Nat Rev Urol. 2016. PMID: 27549361 Review.
-
Development and Validation of a Novel Skills Training Model for PCNL, an ESUT project.Acta Biomed. 2022 Aug 31;93(4):e2022254. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i4.11821. Acta Biomed. 2022. PMID: 36043983 Free PMC article.
-
Low-cost simulation models in Urology: a systematic review of the literature.Cent European J Urol. 2020;73(3):373-380. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2020.0122. Epub 2020 Jul 8. Cent European J Urol. 2020. PMID: 33133668 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Carter FJ, Schijven MP, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov T, Francis NK, Hanna GB, et al. Consensus guidelines for validation of virtual reality surgical simulators. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1523–32. - PubMed
-
- Häcker A, Wendt-Nordahl G, Honeck P, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T. A biological model to teach percutaneous nephrolithotomy technique with ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided access. J Endourol. 2007;21:545–50. - PubMed
-
- Jutzi S, Imkamp F, Kuczyk MA, Walcher U, Nagele U, Herrmann TR. New ex vivo organ model for percutaneous renal surgery using a laparoendoscopic training box: The sandwich model. World J Urol. 2014;32:783–9. - PubMed
-
- Zhang Y, Yu CF, Liu JS, Wang G, Zhu H, Na YQ. Training for percutaneous renal access on a virtual reality simulator. Chin Med J (Engl) 2013;126:1528–31. - PubMed
-
- Shan CJ, Mazzucchi E, Payao F, Gomes AC, Baroni RH, Torricelli FC, et al. The skin-to-calyx distance measured by renal CT scan and ultrasound. Int Braz J Urol. 2014;40:212–9. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources