Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr 15:14:10.
doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0008-0. eCollection 2015.

What do I do? Developing a taxonomy of chaplaincy activities and interventions for spiritual care in intensive care unit palliative care

Affiliations

What do I do? Developing a taxonomy of chaplaincy activities and interventions for spiritual care in intensive care unit palliative care

Kevin Massey et al. BMC Palliat Care. .

Abstract

Background: Chaplains are increasingly seen as key members of interdisciplinary palliative care teams, yet the specific interventions and hoped for outcomes of their work are poorly understood. This project served to develop a standard terminology inventory for the chaplaincy field, to be called the chaplaincy taxonomy.

Methods: The research team used a mixed methods approach to generate, evaluate and validate items for the taxonomy. We conducted a literature review, retrospective chart review, focus groups, self-observation, experience sampling, concept mapping, and reliability testing. Chaplaincy activities focused primarily on palliative care in an intensive care unit setting in order to capture a broad cross section of chaplaincy activities.

Results: Literature and chart review resulted in 438 taxonomy items for testing. Chaplain focus groups generated an additional 100 items and removed 421 items as duplications. Self-Observation, Experience Sampling and Concept Mapping provided validity that the taxonomy items were actual activities that chaplains perform in their spiritual care. Inter-rater reliability for chaplains to identify taxonomy items from vignettes was 0.903.

Conclusions: The 100 item chaplaincy taxonomy provides a strong foundation for a normative inventory of chaplaincy activities and outcomes. A deliberative process is proposed to further expand and refine the taxonomy to create a standard terminological inventory for the field of chaplaincy. A standard terminology could improve the ways inter-disciplinary palliative care teams communicate about chaplaincy activities and outcomes.

Keywords: Chaplaincy; Palliative care; Spiritual care; Standard terminology; Taxonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of methods used and taxonomy development.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fitchett G. Screening for Spiritual Risk. Chaplaincy Today. 1999;15(1):2–12.
    1. Handzo G, Flannelly KJ, Murphy KM, Mauman JP, Oettinger M, Goodell E, et al. What do chaplains really do? II. Interventions in the New York chaplaincy study. J Health Care Chaplain. 2008;14(1):39–56. doi: 10.1080/08854720802053853. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hummel L, Galek K, Murphy KM, Tannenbaum HP, Flannelly KJ. Defining spiritual care: an exploratory study. J Health Care Chaplain. 2008;15:40–51. doi: 10.1080/08854720802698509. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puchalski C, Ferrell B, Virani R, Otis-Green S, Baird P, Bull J, et al. Special report - improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: the report of the consensus conference. J Palliat Med. 2009;12(10):885–904. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0142. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aldridge A, Fraser DJ, Morrison K. What do people talk to chaplains about? Scottish Journal of Healthcare Chaplaincy. 2009;12(2):3–9.

Publication types

MeSH terms