Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:925414.
doi: 10.1155/2015/925414. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

Comparative analysis of anterior segment parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes generated by scheimpflug tomography

Affiliations

Comparative analysis of anterior segment parameters in normal and keratoconus eyes generated by scheimpflug tomography

Faik Orucoglu et al. J Ophthalmol. 2015.

Abstract

Purpose. To assess and compare the anterior and posterior corneal surface parameters, keratoconus indices, thickness profile data, and data from enhanced elevation maps of keratoconic and normal corneas with the Pentacam Scheimpflug corneal tomography and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of these parameters in discriminating keratoconus from normal eyes. Methods. The study included 656 keratoconus eyes and 515 healthy eyes with a mean age of 30.95 ± 9.25 and 32.90 ± 14.78 years, respectively. Forty parameters obtained from the Pentacam tomography were assessed by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for their efficiency. Results. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed excellent predictive accuracy (area under the curve, ranging from 0.914 to 0.972) for 21 of the 40 parameters evaluated. Among all parameters indices of vertical asymmetry, keratoconus index, front elevation at thinnest location, back elevation at thinnest location, Ambrósio Relational Thickness (ARTmax), deviation of average pachymetric progression, deviation of ARTmax, and total deviation showed excellent (>90%) sensitivity and specificity in addition to excellent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Conclusions. Parameters derived from the topometric and Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display maps very effectively discriminate keratoconus from normal corneas with excellent sensitivity and specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Topographic, (b) topometric, and (c) Belin-Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display maps of the Pentacam.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rabinowitz Y. S. Keratoconus. Survey of Ophthalmology. 1998;42(4):297–319. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6257(97)00119-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rabinowitz Y. S. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. Journal of Refractive Surgery. 1995;11(5):371–379. - PubMed
    1. Burns D. M., Johnston F. M., Frazer D. G., Patterson C., Jackson A. J. Keratoconus: an analysis of corneal asymmetry. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2004;88(10):1252–1255. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2003.033670. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schlegel Z., Hoang-Xuan T., Gatinel D. Comparison of and correlation between anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps in normal eyes and keratoconus-suspect eyes. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2008;34(5):789–795. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.12.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miháltz K., Kovács I., Takács Á., Nagy Z. Z. Evaluation of keratometric, pachymetric, and elevation parameters of keratoconic corneas with pentacam. Cornea. 2009;28(9):976–980. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31819e34de. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources