Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb;51(1):220-39.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12310. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

Observing versus Predicting: Initial Patterns of Filling Predict Long-Term Adherence More Accurately Than High-Dimensional Modeling Techniques

Affiliations

Observing versus Predicting: Initial Patterns of Filling Predict Long-Term Adherence More Accurately Than High-Dimensional Modeling Techniques

Jessica M Franklin et al. Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: Despite the proliferation of databases with increasingly rich patient data, prediction of medication adherence remains poor. We proposed and evaluated approaches for improved adherence prediction.

Data sources: We identified Medicare beneficiaries who received prescription drug coverage through CVS Caremark and initiated a statin.

Study design: A total of 643 variables were identified at baseline from prior claims and linked Census data. In addition, we identified three postbaseline predictors, indicators of adherence to statins during each of the first 3 months of follow-up. We estimated 10 models predicting subsequent adherence, using logistic regression and boosted logistic regression, a nonparametric data-mining technique. Models were also estimated within strata defined by the index days supply.

Results: In 77,703 statin initiators, prediction using baseline variables only was poor with maximum cross-validated C-statistics of 0.606 and 0.577 among patients with index supply ≤30 days and >30 days, respectively. Using only indicators of initial statin adherence improved prediction accuracy substantially among patients with shorter initial dispensings (C = 0.827/0.518), and, when combined with investigator-specified variables, prediction accuracy was further improved (C = 0.842/0.596).

Conclusions: Observed adherence immediately after initiation predicted future adherence for patients whose initial dispensings were relatively short.

Keywords: Adherence; boosting; comparative effectiveness; epidemiologic methods; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Design
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Number of Patients with Each Initial Adherence Pattern and the Percent of Patients with Each Pattern That Were Fully Adherent during Days 1–365 (1‐year Adherence) or 91–365 (Delayed Adherence) after Statin Initiation, Separately by Index Days Supply

References

    1. Beale, E. , Kendall M., and Mann D.. 1967. “The Discarding of Variables in Multivariate Analysis.” Biometrika 54 (3–4): 357–66. - PubMed
    1. Benner, J. S. , Glynn R. J., Mogun H., Neumann P. J., Weinstein M. C., and Avorn J.. 2002. “Long‐Term Persistence in Use of Statin Therapy in Elderly Patients.” Journal of the American Medical Association 288 (4): 455–61. - PubMed
    1. Breiman, L. 2001. “Random Forests.” Machine Learning 45 (1): 5–32.
    1. Brookhart, M. A. , Patrick A. R., Dormuth C., Avorn J., Shrank W., Cadarette S. M., and Solomon D. H.. 2007. “Adherence to Lipid‐Lowering Therapy and the Use of Preventive Health Services: An Investigation of the Healthy User Effect.” American Journal of Epidemiology 166 (3): 348–54. - PubMed
    1. Caro, J. J. , Salas M., Speckman J. L., Raggio G., and Jackson J.. 1999. “Persistence with Treatment for Hypertension in Actual Practice.” Canadian Medical Association Journal 160 (1): 31–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources