The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines
- PMID: 25879466
- PMCID: PMC4417537
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1242-9
The implementation of an organised cervical screening programme in Poland: an analysis of the adherence to European guidelines
Abstract
Background: Well-organised quality-controlled screening can substantially reduce the burden of cervical cancer (CC). European guidelines (EuG) for quality assurance in CC screening provide guidance on all aspects of an organised screening programme. Organised CC screening in Poland was introduced in 2007. The purpose of our study was to analyse: (i) adherence of the programme to EuG; (ii) programme process and performance indicators; (iii) impact of the programme on the incidence of and mortality from CC.
Methods: Available data on the policy, structure and functioning of the Polish programme were compared with the major points of the EuG. Data on the process, and available performance indicators were drawn from the screening database and other National Health Fund (NHF) systems. Joinpoint regression was used to assess changes in CC incidence and mortality trends.
Results: The Polish programme adheres partially to EuG in terms of policy and organisation. Only a limited set of performance indicators can be calculated due to screening database incompleteness or lack of linkage between existing databases. The screening database does not include opportunistic smears collected within NHF-reimbursed or private care. The organised programme coverage rate fluctuated from 21% to 27% between 2007-2013. In 2012 the coverage reached 35% after combining both organised and opportunistic smears reimbursed by the NHF. In 2012 the number of smears reimbursed by NHF was 60% higher in opportunistic than in organised screening with significant overlap. Data from the private sector are not recorded. Depending on years, 30-50% of women referred for colposcopy/biopsy because of abnormal Pap smears were managed within the programme. The age-standardised CC incidence and mortality dropped linearly between 1999 and 2011 without evidence of a period effect.
Conclusions: The Polish organised cervical screening programme is only partially adherent to evidence-based EuG. Its implementation has not influenced the burden of CC in the country so far. Changes with special focus on increasing coverage, development of information systems and assessment of quality are required to increase programme adherence to EuG and to measure its effectiveness. Our findings may be useful to improve the Polish programme and those implemented or planned in other countries.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Reimbursed Costs of Management of Uterine Cervical Lesions in Poland--a Descriptive Analysis of Data from the National Health Fund and the Ministry of Health.Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016 Jun;24(2):163-8. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4737. Epub 2016 May 13. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 27178030
-
HPV testing in Polish population-based cervical cancer screening programme (HIPPO project)-study protocol of a randomised healthcare policy trial.BMC Cancer. 2023 Nov 17;23(1):1118. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11597-5. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 37978452 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Poland: is there an impact of the introduction of the organised screening?Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;32(6):529-532. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0291-6. Epub 2017 Aug 5. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017. PMID: 28780640
-
'Organised' cervical screening 45 years on: How consistent are organised screening practices?Eur J Cancer. 2014 Nov;50(17):3029-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Oct 1. Eur J Cancer. 2014. PMID: 25282406 Review.
-
Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.Prescrire Int. 2010 Aug;19(108):172-7, 179. Prescrire Int. 2010. PMID: 20939454 Review.
Cited by
-
Students' Knowledge about Cervical Cancer Prevention in Poland.Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Sep 30;57(10):1045. doi: 10.3390/medicina57101045. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021. PMID: 34684082 Free PMC article.
-
What affects response rates in primary healthcare-based programmes? An analysis of individual and unit-related factors associated with increased odds of non-response based on HCV screening in the general population in Poland.BMJ Open. 2016 Dec 7;6(12):e013359. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013359. BMJ Open. 2016. PMID: 27927665 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing.Viruses. 2018 Dec 19;10(12):729. doi: 10.3390/v10120729. Viruses. 2018. PMID: 30572620 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preventive Health Screening during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey among 102,928 Internet Users in Poland.J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 14;11(12):3423. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123423. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35743493 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer and prevention measures among female students in Poland: a cross-sectional, decade apart study.J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Mar;36(2):e23. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e23. J Gynecol Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40165390 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE. Screening for Cancer of the Uterine Cervix. From the IARC Working Group on Cervical Cancer Screening and the UICC Project Group on the Evaluation of Screening Programmes for Cancer. WHO (Geneva), IARC (Lyon), and UICC (Geneva): IARC Sci Publ; 1986. - PubMed
-
- Siebert U, Sroczynski G, Hillemanns P, Engel J, Stabenow R, Stegmaier C, et al. The German cervical cancer screening model: development and validation of a decision-analytic model for cervical cancer screening in Germany. Eur J Public Health. 2006;16:185–92. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki163. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wojciechowska U, Didkowska J. Zachorowania i zgony na nowotwory złośliwe w Polsce. Krajowy Rejestr Nowotworów, Centrum Onkologii - Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej - Curie. Available at: http://onkologia.org.pl.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials