Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Apr;94(15):e621.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000621.

What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps?: Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

What is the most accurate method for the treatment of diminutive colonic polyps?: Standard versus jumbo forceps polypectomy

Fatih Aslan et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Different methods such as standard, hot, and jumbo forceps are used in endoscopic treatment of diminutive colon polyps. In the current study, it was aimed to compare efficacy and safety of standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods in treatment of diminutive colon polyps of ≤5 mm. Polyps with ≤5 mm which were excised during colonoscopy by using standard or jumbo forceps were evaluated. Standard and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods were randomly performed in 212 consecutive patients with diminutive colorectal polyp. One-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were also determined among polypectomy methods. Results of 161 standard forceps polypectomy and 102 jumbo forceps polypectomy were retrospectively evaluated. Both one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rates were significantly higher in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group than the standard forceps polypectomy group (P < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis performed according to polyp sizes, complete resection rate among polyps with 3-mm diameter was determined as 100%. However, numbers of bites in 4-mm and 5-mm polyps were higher in the standard forceps polypectomy group, and complete resection rate was lower than in the jumbo forceps polypectomy group (P < 0.001). Both endoscopic treatment methods may be employed in treatment of diminutive colon polyps with ≤5 mm. However, jumbo forceps polypectomy is a more effective treatment method in 4- to 5-mm polyps with high one-bite polypectomy and complete resection rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Standard biopsy forceps and jumbo biopsy forceps image.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
(A) Number of bites during removal of polyps with sizes 3, 4, and 5 mm by the standard forceps polypectomy or jumbo forceps polypectomy method. (B) Complete and incomplete resection rates of the standard forceps polypectomy and jumbo forceps polypectomy methods performed in treatment of polyps with 3, 4, and 5 mm in diameter. JFP = jumbo forceps polypectomy; SFP = standard forceps polypectomy.

References

    1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1977–1981. - PubMed
    1. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366:687–696. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Horiuchi A, Tanaka N. Improving quality measures in colonoscopy and its therapeutic intervention. World J GastroenterolV 20 2014; 13027–13034. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderloni A, Jovani M, Hassan C, et al. Advances, problems, and complications of polypectomy. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2014; 7:285–296. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Singh N, Harrison M, Rex DK. A survey of colonoscopic polypectomy practices among clinical gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endos 2004; 60:414–418. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources