Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Apr 16:350:h1640.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1640.

Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation preceding cognitive behavioural management for chronic low back pain: sham controlled double blinded randomised controlled trial

Kerstin Luedtke  1 , Alison Rushton  2 , Christine Wright  2 , Tim Jürgens  1 , Astrid Polzer  1 , Gerd Mueller  3 , Arne May  4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation preceding cognitive behavioural management for chronic low back pain: sham controlled double blinded randomised controlled trial

Kerstin Luedtke et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation alone and in combination with cognitive behavioural management in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.

Design: Double blind parallel group randomised controlled trial with six months' follow-up conducted May 2011-March 2013. Participants, physiotherapists, assessors, and analyses were blinded to group allocation.

Setting: Interdisciplinary chronic pain centre.

Participants: 135 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain >12 weeks were recruited from 225 patients assessed for eligibility.

Intervention: Participants were randomised to receive anodal (20 minutes to motor cortex at 2 mA) or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (identical electrode position, stimulator switched off after 30 seconds) for five consecutive days immediately before cognitive behavioural management (four week multidisciplinary programme of 80 hours).

Main outcomes measures: Two primary outcome measures of pain intensity (0-100 visual analogue scale) and disability (Oswestry disability index) were evaluated at two primary endpoints after stimulation and after cognitive behavioural management.

Results: Analyses of covariance with baseline values (pain or disability) as covariates showed that transcranial direct current stimulation was ineffective for the reduction of pain (difference between groups on visual analogue scale 1 mm (99% confidence interval -8.69 mm to 6.3 mm; P=0.68)) and disability (difference between groups 1 point (-1.73 to 1.98; P=0.86)) and did not influence the outcome of cognitive behavioural management (difference between group 3 mm (-10.32 mm to 6.73 mm); P=0.58; difference between groups on Oswestry disability index 0 point (-2.45 to 2.62); P=0.92). The stimulation was well tolerated with minimal transitory side effects.

Conclusions: This results of this trial on the effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the reduction of pain and disability do not support its clinical use for managing non-specific chronic low back pain.Trial registration Current controlled trials ISRCTN89874874.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: AM, TJ, KL, and AP had financial support from DFG (MA 1862/10-1) and NeuroImageNord for the submitted work.

Figures

None
Fig 1 Flowchart for trial of effectiveness of anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone and before cognitive behavioural management (CBT) for patients with chronic low back pain
None
Fig 2 Flow of patient inclusion and numbers of participants available for analysis at each prespecified time point for both primary outcome measures (Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS)) in trial of effectiveness of anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) before cognitive behavioural management (CBT) for patients with chronic low back pain
None
Fig 3 Box plot of visual analogue scale (VAS) pain values at baseline and primary endpoints (after anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and after cognitive behavioural management (CBT)) for patients with chronic low back pain
None
Fig 4 Box plot of Oswestry disability index (ODI) values at baseline and primary endpoints (after anodal or sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and after cognitive behavioural management (CBT)) for patients with chronic low back pain
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Becker A, Held H, Redaelli M, et al. Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization. Spine 2010;35:1714-20. - PubMed
    1. Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, et al. Prevalence of and screening for serious spinal pathology in patients presenting to primary care settings with acute low back pain. Arthritis Rheum 2009;60:3072-80. - PubMed
    1. Chou R, Shekelle P. Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? JAMA 2010;303:1295-02. - PubMed
    1. Grotle M, Brox JI, Veierod MB, et al. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: patients consulting primary care for the first time. Spine 2005;30:976-82. - PubMed
    1. Gurcay E, Bal A, Eksioglu E, et al. Acute low back pain: clinical course and prognostic factors. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:840-5. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data