Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Apr 17;10(4):e0122964.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122964. eCollection 2015.

Systemic lupus erythematous and malignancy risk: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systemic lupus erythematous and malignancy risk: a meta-analysis

Lihong Cao et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Pilot studies have estimated cancer incidence in patients with systemic lupus erythematous (SLE). However, the results have been inconclusive. To ascertain the correlation between SLE and malignancy more comprehensively and precisely, we conducted a meta-analysis.

Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases through June 2014, were searched to identify observational studies evaluating the association between SLE and malignancy. The outcomes from these studies were measured as relative risks (RRs). A random or fixed effects model was chosen to calculate the pooled RR according to heterogeneity test. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed by estimating I2 index. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test.

Results: A total of 16 papers, including 59,662 SLE patients, were suitable for the meta-analysis. Of these papers, 15 reported RRs for overall malignancy, 12 for non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and lung cancer, 7 for bladder cancer, 6 for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and leukemia, 5 for skin melanoma, and liver and thyroid cancers, 4 for multiple myeloma (MM), and esophageal and vaginal/vulvar cancers and 3 for laryngeal and non-melanoma skin cancers. The pooled RRs were 1.28 (95% CI, 1.17-1.41) for overall cancer, 5.40 (95% CI, 3.75-7.77) for NHL, 3.26(95% CI, 2.17-4.88) for HL, 2.01(95% CI, 1.61-2.52) for leukemia, 1.45(95% CI, 1.04-2.03) for MM, 4.19(95% CI, 1.98-8.87) for laryngeal cancer, 1.59 (95% CI, 1.44-1.76) for lung cancer, 1.86(95% CI, 1.21-2.88) for esophageal cancer, 3.21(95% CI, 1.70-6.05) for liver cancer, 3.67(95% CI, 2.80-4.81) for vaginal/vulvar cancer, 2.11(95% CI, 1.12-3.99) for bladder cancer, 1.51(95% CI, 1.12-2.03) for non-melanoma skin cancer, 1.78(95% CI, 1.35-2.33) for thyroid cancer, and 0.65(95% CI, 0.50-0.85) for skin melanoma. Only the meta-analyses of overall malignancy, NHL, and liver and bladder cancers produced substantial heterogeneity (I2, 57.6% vs 74.3% vs 67.7% vs 82.3%). No apparent publication bias was detected except for NHL studies.

Conclusions: Our data support an association between SLE and malignancy, not only demonstrating an increased risk for NHL, HL, leukemia, and some non-hematologic malignancies, including laryngeal, lung, liver, vaginal/vulvar, and thyroid malignancies, but also a reduced risk for skin melanoma. Although an increased risk of MM, and esophageal, bladder and non-melanoma skin cancers was identified from the accumulated data in these studies, this observation requires confirmation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Relative risk of overall malignancy in patients with SLE compared with the general population.
(N, number of patients with SLE; n, number of cancer cases).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Galbraith plots of association between SLE and overall malignancy.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Egger’s test for the publication bias among overall malignancy studies.
(P = 0.055).
Fig 5
Fig 5. Relative risk of NHL in patients with SLE compared with the general population.
(N, number of patients with SLE; n, number of cancer cases.)
Fig 6
Fig 6. Galbraith plots of association between SLE and NHL.
Fig 7
Fig 7. Egger’s test for the publication bias among NHL studies.
(P = 0.035).

References

    1. Agmon-Levin N, Blank M, Paz Z, Shoenfeld Y. Molecular mimicry in systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2009; 18: 1181–1185. 10.1177/0961203309346653 - DOI - PubMed
    1. D'Cruz DP, Khamashta MA, Hughes GR. Systemic lupus erythematosus. 2007; Lancet 369: 587–596. - PubMed
    1. Huang HB, Jiang SC, Han J, Cheng QS, Dong CB, Pan CM. A systematic review of the epidemiological literature on the risk of urological cancers in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014; 140: 1067–1073. 10.1007/s00432-014-1604-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kassan SS, Thomas TL, Moutsopoulos HM, Hoover R, Kimberly RP, Budman DR, et al. Increased risk of lymphoma in sicca syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 1978; 89: 888–892. - PubMed
    1. Amissah-Arthur MB, Gordon C. Contemporary treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: an update for clinicians. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2010; 1: 163–175. 10.1177/2040622310380100 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms