Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 17:13:11.
doi: 10.1186/s12947-015-0005-8.

The use of strain, strain rate, and displacement by 2D speckle tracking for assessment of systolic left ventricular function in goats: applicability and influence of general anesthesia

Affiliations

The use of strain, strain rate, and displacement by 2D speckle tracking for assessment of systolic left ventricular function in goats: applicability and influence of general anesthesia

Ann-Sabin J Berli et al. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. .

Abstract

Background: Assessment of left ventricular (LV) systolic function can be achieved by conventional echocardiographic methods, but quantification of contractility, regional myocardial function, and ventricular synchrony is challenging. The goal of this study was to investigate the applicability of two-dimensional speckle tracking (2DST) to characterize segmental and global wall motion for assessment of LV function and LV synchrony in healthy goats. We aimed to describe the techniques, report normal values of a variety of 2DST indices, and determine the influence of general anesthesia.

Methods: Prospective study on 22 healthy female Saanen goats (3.7 ± 1.1 y, 60.2 ± 10.5 kg [mean ± SD]). All goats underwent two transthoracic echocardiographic examinations, the first standing and unsedated and the second 7.4 ± 3.5 days later during isoflurane anesthesia and positioned in sternal recumbency. Data analyses were performed offline, blinded, and in random order. Left ventricular longitudinal, radial and circumferential strain and strain rate as well as longitudinal and radial displacement were measured using 2DST methods. Summary statistics were generated and differences of 2DST variables between myocardial segments and treatments (i.e., awake vs. anesthetized) were assessed statistically (alpha level=0.05).

Results: Echocardiographic analyses by 2DST were feasible in all goats and at both time points. Longitudinal systolic strain, strain rate and displacement followed a gradient from apex to base. Absolute systolic strain was generally lower and strain rate was higher in awake goats compared to anesthetized goats. Circumferential and radial indices did not consistently follow a segmental pattern. Generally, peak strain occurred later in anesthetized goats compared to awake goats. General anesthesia did not significantly influence LV synchrony.

Conclusions: 2SDT is a valid method for non-invasive characterization of LV wall motion in awake and anesthetized goats. The results of this study add to the understanding of LV mechanical function, aid in the diagnosis of global and segmental LV systolic dysfunction, and will be useful for future cardiovascular studies in this species. However, effects of anesthesia and species-specific characteristics should be considered when goats are used as animal models for human disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Post-systolic motion in left ventricular long-axis and short-axis recordings. Prevalence of post-systolic motion (PSM) in awake and anesthetized goats. Post-systolic motion was diagnosed where peak strain occurred after aortic valve closure. A: PSM based on timing of longitudinal peak strain (tεL), B: PSM based on timing of circumferential peak strain (tεC) at the apical short-axis level (SAX-AP), C: PSM based on timing of radial peak strain (tεR) at the apical short-axis level (SAX-AP), D: PSM based on tεC at the papillary muscle short-axis level (SAX-PM), E: PSM based on tεR at the papillary muscle short-axis level (SAX-PM), F: PSM based on tεC at the chordal short-axis level (SAX-CH), G: PSM based on tεR at the chordal short-axis level (SAX-CH).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Segmental 2DST analyses of left ventricular long-axis recordings. A: εL, longitudinal peak strain. B: SRL-sys, longitudinal peak systolic strain rate. C: SRL-E, longitudinal peak early-diastolic strain rate. D: SRL-A, longitudinal peak late-diastolic strain rate. E: DL, longitudinal peak displacement. F: DT, transverse peak displacement. Box-and-whisker diagrams, with the line near the middle of the box indicating the median, the top and the bottom of the box indicating the upper and lower quartile, and the whiskers indicating the 5th and 95th percentile observations, respectively. P values of the F test are listed next to each graph; factors for which multiple comparison post hoc testing was performed are displayed in italics. Segments and treatments marked with the same letter were not significantly different from each other when undergoing post hoc testing for multiple comparisons.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A-C. Segmental 2DST analyses of left ventricular short-axis recordings at the apical level (A), at the papillary muscle level (B) and at the chordal level (C). A: εC, circumferential peak strain. B: εR, radial peak strain. C: DR, radial peak displacement. D: SRC-sys, circumferential peak systolic strain rate. E: SRC-E, circumferential peak early-diastolic strain rate. F: SRC-A, circumferential peak late-diastolic strain rate. G: SRR-sys, radial peak systolic strain rate. H: SRR-E, radial peak early-diastolic strain rate. I: SRR-A, radial peak late-diastolic strain rate. Box-and-whisker diagrams, with the line near the middle of the box indicating the median, the top and the bottom of the box indicating the upper and lower quartile, and the whiskers indicating the 5th and 95th percentile observations, respectively. P values of the F test are listed next to each graph; factors for which multiple comparison post hoc testing was performed are displayed in italics. Segments and treatments marked with the same letter were not significantly different from each other when undergoing post hoc testing for multiple comparisons.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Segmental timing of peak strain in left ventricular long-axis and short-axis recordings. Segmental timing of peak strain, expressed as the time interval from the electrocardiographic R wave to longitudinal, circumferential, and radial peak strain of each segment. A: Time to longitudinal peak strain (tεL) in left ventricular long-axis recordings. B: Time to circumferential peak strain (tεC) in left ventricular short-axis recordings at the apical level. C: Time to radial peak strain (tεR) in left ventricular short-axis recordings at the apical level. D: Time to circumferential peak strain (tεC) in left ventricular short-axis recordings at the papillary muscle level. E: Time to radial peak strain (tεR) in left ventricular short-axis recordings at the papillary muscle level. F: Time to circumferential peak strain (tεC) in left ventricular short-axis recordings at the chordal level. G: Time to radial peak strain (tεR) in left ventricular short-axis recordings at the chordal level. Box-and-whisker diagrams, with the line near the middle of the box indicating the median, the top and the bottom of the box indicating the upper and lower quartile, and the whiskers indicating the 5th and 95th percentile observations, respectively. P values of the F test are listed next to each graph; factors for which multiple comparison post hoc testing was performed are displayed in italics. Segments and treatments marked with the same letter were not significantly different from each other when undergoing post hoc testing for multiple comparisons.

References

    1. Boon JA. Veterinary Echocardiography. 2nd edition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. Evaluation of size, function, and hemodynamics; pp. 153–266.
    1. Otto CM. Textbook of Clinical Echocardiography. 3. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2004. Left and right ventricular systolic function; pp. 131–65.
    1. Teske AJ, Boeck BWD, Melman PG, Sieswerda GT, Doevendans PA, Cramer MJ. Echocardiographic quantification of myocardial function using tissue deformation imaging, a guide to image acquisition and analysis using tissue Doppler and speckle tracking. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2007;5:27. doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-5-27. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dandel M, Hetzer R. Echocardiographic strain and strain rate imaging—clinical applications. Int J Cardiol. 2009;132:11–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.091. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Edvardsen T, Gerber BL, Garot J, Bluemke DA, Lima JAC, Smiseth OA. Quantitative assessment of intrinsic regional myocardial deformation by Doppler strain rate echocardiography in humans: validation against three-dimensional tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;206:50–6. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000019907.77526.75. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances