Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Apr 17;10(4):e0124233.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124233. eCollection 2015.

Detection of serum IgG4 levels in patients with IgG4-related disease and other disorders

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detection of serum IgG4 levels in patients with IgG4-related disease and other disorders

Yuying Su et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Elevated serum IgG4 levels are an important hallmark for diagnosing IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD), but can also be observed in other diseases. This study aimed to compare two different testing methods for IgG4: ELISA and nephelometric assay. Both assays were used to measure serum IgG4 concentrations, and to assess the prevalence of high serum IgG4 levels in both IgG4-RD and non-IgG4-RD diseases.

Methods: A total of 80 serum samples were tested using the nephelometric assay and ELISA method that we established. Serum IgG4 concentrations were determined by ELISA for 957 patients with distinct diseases, including 12 cases of IgG4-RD and 945 cases of non-IgG4-RD.

Results: IgG4 levels from 80 selected serum samples examined by ELISA were in agreement with those detected using the nephelometry assay. Meanwhile, the serum IgG4 concentrations measured by ELISA were also consistent with the clinical diagnoses of patients with IgG4-RD during the course of disease. The Elevated levels of serum IgG4 (>1.35 g/L) were detected in all IgG4-RD (12/12) patients, and the prevalence of high IgG4 serum levels was 3.39% in non-IgG4-RD cases. Among them, the positive rates of serum IgG4 were 2.06% in patients with carcinoma and 6.3% in patients with other non-IgG4 autoimmune diseases.

Conclusion: Our established ELISA method is a reliable and convenient technique, which could be extensively used in the clinic to measure serum IgG4 levels. High levels of IgG4 were observed in IgG4-RD. However, this phenomenon could also be observed in other diseases, such as carcinomas and other autoimmune diseases. Thus, a diagnosis of IgG4 disease cannot only be dependent on the detection of elevated serum IgG4 levels.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Detection of serum IgG4 levels in 80 patients using both ELISA and nephelometry methods.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Serum IgG4 levels in various disorders (measured by ELISA).
(mean±SD = 0.46±0.49g/L vs. 0.51±0.52g/L vs. 0.61±0.73g/L vs. 0.47±0.53g/L vs. 0.41±0.30g/L vs. 0.36±0.30g/L vs. 0.65±0.52g/L vs. 0.30±0.20g/L vs. 0.73±0.94g/L vs. 0.42±0.41g/L vs. 0.48±0.50g/L vs. 3.83±1.36g/L)
Fig 3
Fig 3. Serum IgG4 levels (mean values) in IgG4-RD patients before and after treatment (measured by ELISA).
A: Numbers 1 to 8 indicate different patients. Serum IgG4 titers of 8 participants with IgG4-RD were compared before and after treatment. The follow-up time was 1 to 14 months.B: A comparison of the mean serum IgG4 levels from 8 IgG4-RD patients before and after treatment. (mean±SD = 6.21±3.86g/L vs. 2.96±1.10g/L). The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was applied to compare serum IgG4 concentrations; P<0.05.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Serum IgG4 levels in patients with different types of tumors.
(mean±SD = 0.48±0.49g/L vs. 0.40±0.31g/L vs. 0.40±0.29g/L vs. 0.43±0.39g/L vs. 0.51±0.69g/L vs. 0.57±0.69g/L vs. 0.49±0.38g/L vs. 0.44±0.35g/L vs. 0.42±0.26g/L vs. 0.35±0.37g/L vs. 0.58±0.36g/L vs. 0.55±0.46g/L vs. 0.40±0.25g/L vs. 0.30±0.32g/L vs. 0.31±0.34g/L vs. 0.47±0.37g/L).

References

    1. Masaki Y, Dong L, Kurose N, Kitagawa K, Morikawa Y, Yamamoto M, et al. Proposal for a new clinical entity, IgG4-positive multiorgan lymphoproliferative syndrome: analysis of 64 cases of IgG4-related disorders.Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68: 1310–1315. 10.1136/ard.2008.089169 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Khosroshahi A, Stone JH. A clinical overview of IgG4-related systemic disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011; 23: 57–66. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e3283418057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smyrk TC. Pathological features of IgG4-related sclerosing disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2011; 23: 74–79. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328341347b - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hamano H, Kawa S, Horiuchi A, Unno H, Furuya N, Akamatsu T, et al. High serum IgG4 concentrations in patients with sclerosing pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 732–738. - PubMed
    1. Umehara H, Okazaki K, Masaki Y, Kawano M, Yamamoto M, Saeki T, et al. Comprehensive diagnostic criteria for IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). Mod Rheumatol. 2012; 22: 21–30. 10.1007/s10165-011-0571-z - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances